Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

38 questions · 38 findings · 16 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 9 · 23.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 11 · 28.9%Low 10 · 26.3%Moderate 8 · 21.1%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Group cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis vs standard care · Clinically important change, shown as improved – as defined by individual studies
  Cognitive behavioural therapy (group) for schizophrenia 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
Direct match · question page
- Acupuncture plus routine care/diabetes control vs the same treatment alone (routine care/diabetes control) · Proportion of people whose symptoms 'improved' (short term: 4 to 12 weeks)
  Acupuncture for symptomatic gastroparesis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.47 [1.06, 2.04]
  3 studies · 217 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- Acupuncture plus routine care/diabetes control vs the same treatment alone (routine care/diabetes control) · Proportion of people whose symptoms 'improved' (long term: more than 12 weeks) ‐ not measured
  Acupuncture for symptomatic gastroparesis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
Direct match · question page
- External inspection of compliance with COHSASA hospital accreditation standards vs no external inspection · Indicators for hospital quality of care at 2 years'
  External inspection of compliance with standards for improved healthcare outcomes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service · Physical function Scoring tool: PCS Direction of scales: higher scores indicate improved physical function Time point of measurement: at 12 months in 3 randomised studies (using SF‐36), and at 2 months in 1 randomised study (using SF‐8)
  Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 422 participants
  Very low

Improved care vs care

Sickness absence days, medium‐term · Depressed persons

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 1912 participants
Moderate

Improved care vs care

Days off work · Depressed persons

Improved care showed no clear difference in off work, medium‐term compared with care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.97 [0.77, 1.22]
1 study · 362 participants
Low

Improved care vs care

Depressive symptoms · Depressed persons

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 1808 participants
Moderate

Improved care vs care

Work functioning, medium‐term · Depressed persons

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 604 participants
Moderate

Acupuncture plus routine care/diabetes control vs the same treatment alone (routine care/diabetes control)

Proportion of people whose symptoms 'improved' (short term: 4 to 12 weeks) · symptomatic gastroparesis

It is very uncertain whether acupuncture plus routine care/diabetes control changes proportion of people whose symptoms 'improved' (short term: 4 to 12… compared with the same treatment alone (routine care/diabetes control) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for symptomatic gastroparesis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.47 [1.06, 2.04]
3 studies · 217 participants
Very low

Acupuncture plus routine care/diabetes control vs the same treatment alone (routine care/diabetes control)

Proportion of people whose symptoms 'improved' (long term: more than 12 weeks) ‐ not measured · symptomatic gastroparesis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for symptomatic gastroparesis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

VIDEO GAMES (COMMERCIAL NON‐EXERGAMES) (plus standard care) vs COGNITIVE REMEDIATION (plus standard care)

Cognitive function · patients with schizophrenia

VIDEO GAMES (COMMERCIAL NON‐EXERGAMES) (plus standard care) may leads to lower functioning: specific ‐ cognitive ‐ improved (MCCB, at least 1… compared with COGNITIVE REMEDIATION (plus standard care) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Video games for people with schizophrenia 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.58 [0.34, 0.99]
1 study · 42 participants
Low

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.15 [0.86, 1.54]
1 study · 56 participants
Low

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.76, 1.31]
1 study · 56 participants
Low

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Clinical response: no clinically significant response in mental state · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in mental state: not improved ‐ short‐term BPRS compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.86 [0.63, 1.19]
1 study · 56 participants
Low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Physical function · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 422 participants
Very low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Cognitive function · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 622 participants
Very low

Yoga vs NON‐STANDARD CARE

Mental state‐ general Not improved to an important extent · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA showed no clear difference in mental state: clinically important change PANSS ‐ not improved compared with NON‐STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga versus non‐standard care for schizophrenia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.81 [0.62, 1.07]
1 study · 84 participants
Low

Yoga vs NON‐STANDARD CARE

Social functioning: clinically important change SOFS ‐ overall, not improved · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA showed no clear difference in social functioning: clinically important change SOFS ‐ overall, not… compared with NON‐STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga versus non‐standard care for schizophrenia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.78, 1.04]
1 study · 84 participants
Low

Yoga vs usual care

Global state: no improvement ‐ medium termAs defined in each study · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA probably leads to lower mental state: Overall ‐ not improved PANSS compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.7 [0.55, 0.88]
1 study · 83 participants
Moderate

Yoga vs usual care

Social functioning · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA showed no clear difference in social functioning: Overall ‐ not improved SOFS compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.88 [0.77, 1]
1 study · 83 participants
Moderate

External inspection of compliance with COHSASA hospital accreditation standards vs no external inspection

Indicators for hospital quality of care

1 finding from 1 review

External inspection of compliance with standards for improved healthcare outcomes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Group cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis vs usual care

Clinically important change, shown as improved – as defined by individual studies · patients with schizophrenia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cognitive behavioural therapy (group) for schizophrenia 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care

Mental state: No clinically important improvement · people with severe mental disorders

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intensive case management for severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

De‐escalation for aggression thought to be due to psychosis vs usual care

Aggression ‐ Improved to an important extent · people who are aggressive secondary to serious mental illness

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

De‐escalation techniques for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found