Cochrane · systematic review · CD007198
Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia
Välimäki, M, Hätönen, H, Lahti, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library
SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 7 · 50%Very low 2 · 14.3%Low 5 · 35.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Technology‐mediated psychoeducation compared to standard care intervention for people with schizophrenia
Population: patients with people with schizophrenia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Compliance/satisfaction: leaving the study early ‐ any reason Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs standard care intervention | RR 1.24 [0.81, 1.88] | 2 studies · 116 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness, publication bias |
Mental state: not improved ‐ short‐term BPRS Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs standard care intervention | RR 0.75 [0.56, 1] | 1 study · 84 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs standard care intervention | RR 1.08 [0.82, 1.42] | 1 study · 84 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Knowledge/insight Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs standard care intervention | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Quality of life Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs standard care intervention | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Needs Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs standard care intervention | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Social support Social Network Interview Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs standard care intervention | RR 0.42 [0.04, 0.8] | 1 study · 60 participants | Ungraded |
Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention compared to standard care intervention for people with schizophrenia
Population: patients with people with schizophrenia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Compliance/satisfaction: medication ‐ not compliant ‐ long‐term Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs standard care intervention | RR 0.45 [0.27, 0.77] | 1 study · 71 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Mental state: not improved ‐ short‐term BPRS Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs standard care intervention | RR 0.86 [0.63, 1.19] | 1 study · 56 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs standard care intervention | RR 1.15 [0.86, 1.54] | 1 study · 56 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs standard care intervention | RR 1 [0.76, 1.31] | 1 study · 56 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Quality of life Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs standard care intervention | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Needs Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs standard care intervention | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Social support Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs standard care intervention | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |