Cochrane · systematic review · CD010554
Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia
Broderick, J, Knowles, A, Chadwick, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library
SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 14.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 4 · 57.1%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
YOGA versus STANDARD CARE for schizophrenia
Population: people with schizophrenia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Mental state: Overall ‐ not improved PANSS YOGA vs STANDARD CARE | RR 0.7 [0.55, 0.88] | 1 study · 83 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Social functioning: Overall ‐ not improved SOFS YOGA vs STANDARD CARE | RR 0.88 [0.77, 1] | 1 study · 83 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Quality of life: Average change ‐ mental health SF‐36 YOGA vs STANDARD CARE | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 60 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Physical health: Average change SF‐36 YOGA vs STANDARD CARE | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 60 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Adverse events: any YOGA vs STANDARD CARE | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 94 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Costs of care YOGA vs STANDARD CARE | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Leaving the study early Leaving the study early: participants lost to YOGA vs STANDARD CARE | RR 0.91 [0.6, 1.37] | 8 studies · 457 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |