Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

18 questions · 18 findings · 11 reviews · Schizophrenia

No studies found 3 · 16.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 11.1%Low 9 · 50%Moderate 4 · 22.2%High 0 · 0%

VIDEO GAMES (COMMERCIAL NON‐EXERGAMES) (plus standard care) vs COGNITIVE REMEDIATION (plus standard care)

Cognitive function · patients with schizophrenia

VIDEO GAMES (COMMERCIAL NON‐EXERGAMES) (plus standard care) may leads to lower functioning: specific ‐ cognitive ‐ improved (MCCB, at least 1… compared with COGNITIVE REMEDIATION (plus standard care) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Clinical response: no clinically significant response in mental state · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in mental state: not improved ‐ short‐term BPRS compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga vs NON‐STANDARD CARE

Mental state‐ general Not improved to an important extent · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA showed no clear difference in mental state: clinically important change PANSS ‐ not improved compared with NON‐STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga vs NON‐STANDARD CARE

Social functioning: clinically important change SOFS ‐ overall, not improved · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA showed no clear difference in social functioning: clinically important change SOFS ‐ overall, not… compared with NON‐STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga vs usual care

Global state: no improvement ‐ medium termAs defined in each study · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA probably leads to lower mental state: Overall ‐ not improved PANSS compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga vs usual care

Social functioning · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA showed no clear difference in social functioning: Overall ‐ not improved SOFS compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SOCIAL SKILLS vs usual care

Global state: not clinically improved. CGI · patients with schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether SOCIAL SKILLS changes global state: not clinically improved. CGI compared with STANDARD CARE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

DANCE THERAPY vs usual care

Mental state: 2b. Negative symptoms ‐ not improved (PANSS negative symptom reduction less than 20‐40%) · patients with schizophrenia

DANCE THERAPY probably leads to lower mental state: 2b. Negative symptoms ‐ not improved (PANSS negative… compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs usual care

Clinical response: no clinically significant response in mental state · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation showed no clear difference in mental state: not improved ‐ short‐term BPRS compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs usual care

Global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation showed no clear difference in global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs usual care

Family outcome: Burden ‐ not improved/worse (objective burden related to self‐sufficiency) · patients with schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) changes family outcome: Burden ‐ not improved/worse (objective burden… compared with STANDARD CARE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 1. INTERCESSORY PRAYER (CONTEMPORANEOUS ) vs usual care

Clinical state: 1. Improved/not improved: intermediate or bad outcome · patients with various illnesses

Summary of findings 1. INTERCESSORY PRAYER (CONTEMPORANEOUS ) showed no clear difference in clinical state: 1. Improved/not improved: intermediate or bad outcome compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 3. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER vs usual care

Clinical state: 1. Improved/not improved: intermediate or bad outcome · patients with scheduled to receive non‐emergency CABG

Summary of findings 3. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER showed no clear difference in clinical state: 1. Improved/not improved: intermediate or bad outcome compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review