Cochrane · systematic review · CD006868

Dance therapy for schizophrenia

Ren, J, Xia, J · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library

SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 14.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 5 · 71.4%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

DANCE THERAPY compared with STANDARD CARE for schizophrenia

Population: patients with schizophrenia
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Service utilisation‐days in hospital
DANCE THERAPY vs STANDARD CARE
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical global response‐leaving the study early (short term)
DANCE THERAPY vs STANDARD CARE
RR 0.44 [0.04, 4.49]1 study · 45 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Clinical global response‐leaving the study early (long term)
DANCE THERAPY vs STANDARD CARE
RR 0.68 [0.31, 1.51]1 study · 45 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Mental state: 2a. Negative symptoms ‐ average score (PANSS negative endpoint, high = poor)
DANCE THERAPY vs STANDARD CARE
no estimate extracted1 study · 43 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Mental state: 2b. Negative symptoms ‐ not improved (PANSS negative symptom reduction less than 20‐40%)
DANCE THERAPY vs STANDARD CARE
RR 0.62 [0.39, 0.97]1 study · 45 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Satisfaction with care: Average endpoint score (CAT, high = good)
DANCE THERAPY vs STANDARD CARE
no estimate extracted1 study · 42 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life Manchester Short Assessment (MANSA, high = good)
DANCE THERAPY vs STANDARD CARE
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias