Intervention not reported
No active intervention(2 RCTs, 256 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes no active intervention(2 RCTs, 256 participants) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.28 [0.02, 2.91]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(No direct RCT) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(1 RCT, 161 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes no active intervention(1 RCT, 161 participants) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.36 [0.35, 5.8]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(1 RCT, 140 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes no active intervention(1 RCT, 140 participants) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.14 [0.56, 2.4]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(2 RCTs, 208 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes no active intervention(2 RCTs, 208 participants) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 2.71 [0.97, 7.68]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(10 RCTs, 1200 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding
The intervention may leads to higher no active intervention(10 RCTs, 1200 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 2.04 [1.5, 2.78]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(1 RCT; 40 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention may leads to lower no active intervention(1 RCT; 40 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.22 [0.05, 0.86]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(No direct RCT) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes no active intervention(No direct RCT) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.19 [0, 1726.76]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(3 RCTs; 296 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention probably leads to higher no active intervention(3 RCTs; 296 participants) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.61 [1.01, 2.86]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(4 RCTs; 412 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in no active intervention(4 RCTs; 412 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.2 [0.83, 1.84]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention · people with nonalcohol‐related fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
No active intervention · people with non‐alcohol‐related fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
No active treatment (No direct RCT) · people with liver cirrhosis and ascites
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes no active treatment (No direct RCT) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.66 [0.46, 6.99]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention · people with liver cirrhosis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
No active intervention (only maintenance immunosuppression) (1 RCT; 45 participants) · adults undergoing liver transplantation
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes no active intervention (only maintenance immunosuppression) (1 RCT;… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.76 [0.12, 4.59]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention (1 RCT; 45 participants) · adults undergoing liver transplantation
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes no active intervention (1 RCT; 45 participants) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.75 [0.18, 3.13]
Studies not reported
Very low
Control of bleeding Success in control the active variceal bleeding · acute bleeding gastric varices in people with portal hypertension
It is very uncertain whether cyanoacrylate 1 mL changes control of bleeding Success in control the active variceal bleeding compared with cyanoacrylate 0.5 mL (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Control of bleeding Success in control the active variceal bleeding · acute bleeding gastric varices in people with portal hypertension
It is very uncertain whether cyanoacrylate changes control of bleeding Success in controlling the active variceal… compared with alcohol (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Selective bowel decontamination versus inactive control · people undergoing liver transplantation
It is very uncertain whether intervention changes selective bowel decontamination versus inactive control compared with control (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Mortality (all‐cause) · people with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome
It is very uncertain whether terlipressin changes mortality (All‐cause) compared with other vasoactive drugs (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.96 [0.88, 1.06]
474 participants
Very low