Cochrane · systematic review · CD013121

Primary prevention of variceal bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis: a network meta‐analysis

Roccarina, D, Best, LMJ, Freeman, SC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
34
current version
GRADE rated
32
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 5.9%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 24 · 70.6%Low 8 · 23.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Primary prevention of bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis (all interventions)

Population: people with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding
34 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Interventions
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Beta‐blockers
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
No active intervention(10 RCTs, 1200 participants)
HR 2.04 [1.5, 2.78]NRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Variceal band ligation(17 RCTs, 1640 participants)
HR 1.05 [0.8, 1.38]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Sclerotherapy(5 RCTs, 320 participants)
HR 1.35 [0.95, 1.92]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Beta‐blockers + variceal band ligation(2 RCTs, 313 participants)
HR 1.11 [0.56, 2.19]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Beta‐blockers + nitrates(2 RCTs, 203 participants)
HR 0.84 [0.44, 1.64]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Nitrates(3 RCTs, 298 participants)
HR 1.19 [0.66, 2.11]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Beta‐blockers + sclerotherapy(2 RCTs, 167 participants)
HR 2.08 [1.03, 4.08]NRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Portocaval shunt(No direct RCT)
HR 0.51 [0.06, 2.92]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Variceal band ligation(5 RCTs, 372 participants)
OR 0.75 [0.02, 23.24]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Sclerotherapy(1 RCT, 85 participants)
OR 0.55 [0, 272.05]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Variceal band ligation(1 RCT, 168 participants)
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
No active intervention(2 RCTs, 256 participants)
OR 0.28 [0.02, 2.91]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Variceal band ligation(7 RCTs, 728 participants)
OR 1.6 [0.54, 5.15]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Sclerotherapy(No direct RCT)
OR 1.19 [0.02, 80.24]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Beta‐blockers + nitrates(1 RCT, 57 participants)
OR 3.41 [1.11, 11.28]NRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
No active intervention(No direct RCT)
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Variceal band ligation(4 RCTs, 480 participants)
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Sclerotherapy(2 RCTs, 90 participants)
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Beta‐blockers + variceal band ligation(1 RCT, 140 participants)
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
No active intervention(1 RCT, 161 participants)
HR 1.36 [0.35, 5.8]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Variceal band ligation(5 RCTs, 380 participants)
HR 1.41 [0.83, 2.43]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
No active intervention(1 RCT, 140 participants)
HR 1.14 [0.56, 2.4]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Variceal band ligation(3 RCTs, 330 participants)
HR 0.8 [0.47, 1.36]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Sclerotherapy(1 RCT, 141 participants)
HR 0.91 [0.44, 1.95]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Nitrates(1 RCT, 118 participants)
HR 1.27 [0.61, 2.66]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Beta‐blockers + sclerotherapy(1 RCT, 141 participants)
HR 0.92 [0.41, 2.08]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
No active intervention(2 RCTs, 208 participants)
HR 2.71 [0.97, 7.68]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Variceal band ligation(9 RCTs, 879 participants)
HR 0.72 [0.33, 1.51]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Sclerotherapy(3 RCTs, 175 participants)
HR 1.02 [0.33, 3.27]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Beta‐blockers + variceal band ligation(1 RCT, 173 participants)
HR 0.21 [0.04, 0.71]NRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Nitrates(1 RCT, 52 participants)
HR 6.4 [1.58, 47.42]NRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Variceal band ligation(2 RCTs, 130 participants)
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness