Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

49 questions · 51 findings · 4 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 2 · 3.9%GRADE not reported 3 · 5.9%Very low 10 · 19.6%Low 20 · 39.2%Moderate 16 · 31.4%High 0 · 0%

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Bladder function ‐ Stress incontinence · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in bladder function ‐ Stress urinary incontinence compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or more): Any recurrent prolapse compared with alternative approach (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Effectiveness of treatment · health problem or population
3 findings from 1 review

POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure vs no concomitant continence procedure

Abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery: additional Burch colposuspension vs sacrocolpopexy alone · women with POP and SUI

POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in abdominal POP surgery with vs without concomitant continence… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure vs no concomitant continence procedure

Abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery: additional Burch colposuspension vs sacrocolpopexy alone · continent women with POP

Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review