Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure vs no concomitant continence procedure: Abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery: additional Burch colposuspension vs sacrocolpopexy alone
Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure vs no concomitant continence procedure Abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery: additional Burch colposuspension vs sacrocolpopexy alone · continent women with POP Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (low certainty). Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.31 [0.19, 9.01] | 2 studies · 379 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.