Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

5,762 questions in 263 reviews · Dental caries

current versions
No studies 321 · 5.6%Ungraded 4,450 · 77.2%Very low 455 · 7.9%Low 297 · 5.2%Moderate 200 · 3.5%High 39 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Secondary education vs University education
Prevalence of untreated decay (% DT > 0) · Adults aged 25 years and older in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States · 2009, New Zealand
Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. (2018)
AD 14.1 [5.1, 23.1]1 study · 2041 participantsUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 77.8 [70, 84]14 studiesUngraded
Total-etching 36% phosphoric acid + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Acetone-based total-etch adhesive
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 and 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 3.00 [0.13, 69.52]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs ZOE + calcium hydroxide + iodoform (MPRCF, unnamed product)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 21.79 [1.32, 360.78]1 study · 109 participantsUngraded
Medium income vs High income
Mean number of decayed teeth (mean DT) · Adults aged 25 years and older in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States · 2009, New Zealand
Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. (2018)
AD 0.4 [0.2, 0.6]1 study · 2041 participantsUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 2.50 [0.50, 12.50]2 studies · 110 participantsLow
Fluoride in varnish vs No treatment
Caries increment in permanent teeth · Children or adolescents · At least 1 year or school year, Randomisation year, NMR covariate
Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. (2018)
no estimate extractedNRUngraded
Endoflas (CH + ZOE + iodoform) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.26 [0.05, 1.50]2 studies · 80 participantsModerate
Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.31, 3.27]2 studies · 62 participantsModerate
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Negative LR for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.29 [0.2, 0.4]55 studiesUngraded
Placebo vs No treatment
Caries increment in permanent teeth (DMFS change from baseline) · Children or adolescents · At least 1 year or school year, Network meta-regression covariate: randomization year
Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. (2018)
no estimate extractedNRUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Positive LR for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 3.46 [2.8, 4.3]67 studiesUngraded
Fluoride in dentifrice vs No treatment
Caries increment in permanent teeth · Children or adolescents · At least 1 year or school year, Randomisation year, NMR covariate
Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. (2018)
no estimate extractedNRUngraded
Populations in countries with a lower Human Development Index (high category, HDI <0.800) vs Populations in countries with a higher Human Development Index (very high, HDI >=0.800)
Dental caries experience (DMFT) · Adults aged 19-60 years · High HDI (<0.800)
Socioeconomic Factors and Caries in People between 19 and 60 Years of Age: An Update of a Systematic Review… (2018)
MEAN 10.01 [5.34, 14.69]6 studiesUngraded
Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Zinc oxide and propolis (ZOP)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.80 [0.26, 2.45]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
Portland cement (PC) vs Full strength formocresol (FC)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6, 12 and 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 2.00 [0.19, 21.06]1 study · 70 participantsUngraded
Acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · up to 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No radiological failure in any participant; not estimable1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Ferric sulphate (FS) vs Buffered glutaraldehyde
Outcome NR · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
Assessed pain, soft tissue, mobility, radiolucency, root resorption, pulp canal obliteration (Goyal 2016); no clinical/radiological failure outcome; no significant differences1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) vs RC Fill
Outcome NR · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
Listed as a pulpectomy comparison; no extractable outcome data reported in this version0 studiesNo studies
Radiographic caries detection vs Reference standard (often histological; also invasive opening)
Advanced proximal carious lesions · Permanent molar surfaces in diagnostic accuracy studies (mostly in vitro; clinical) · Tailored meta-analysis (Egypt)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 44.4 [38, 51]22 studiesUngraded
Primary education vs University education
Prevalence of untreated decay (% DT > 0) · Adults aged 25 years and older in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States · 2003-2004, United States
Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. (2018)
AD 20.11 [15.76, 24.47]1 study · 4568 participantsUngraded
Sealapex (eugenol-free calcium hydroxide) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.50 [0.10, 2.43]1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Secondary education vs University education
Prevalence of untreated decay (% DT > 0) · Adults aged 25 years and older in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States · 2004-2006, Australia
Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. (2018)
AD 14.4 [7.7, 21.0]1 study · 5073 participantsUngraded
Endoflas (CH + ZOE + iodoform) vs RC Fill
Outcome NR · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
Listed as a pulpectomy comparison but no extractable outcome data reported in this version0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride in gel vs Placebo
Caries increment in permanent teeth (DMFS change from baseline) · Children or adolescents · At least 1 year or school year, Network meta-regression covariate: randomization year
Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. (2018)
no estimate extractedNRUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs IRM (intermediate restorative material)
Outcome NR · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
Listed as a pulpectomy comparison; no extractable outcome data reported in this version0 studiesNo studies
Post-secondary education vs University education
Prevalence of fair/poor self-rated oral health · Adults aged 25 years and older in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States · 2003-2004, United States
Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. (2018)
AD 20.8 [16.3, 25.4]1 study · 4568 participantsUngraded
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs Formocresol (FC)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 7.00 [0.39, 124.83]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Older mean age (>33.4 years) vs Not applicable
Mean DMFT · Adult participants in 25 meta-regression studies · Model 1 adjusted
Socioeconomic Factors and Caries in People between 19 and 60 Years of Age: An Update of a Systematic Review… (2018)
Meta-regression coefficient 5.2481586 studiesUngraded
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs RC Fill
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6, 12 and 30 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No clinical failure in any participant at 6/12/30 months (Pramila 2016); not estimable1 study · 86 participantsUngraded
Aloe vera vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 28.00 [4.07, 192.79]1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.20 [0.03, 1.59]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Non-extraction (retained first permanent molar) or contralateral non-extraction side
Post-extraction space (spontaneous space closure / decrease in space) · Children aged 5 to 15 years with a compromised first permanent molar
Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review. (2018)
Spontaneous space closure ranged from 45.5% to 85.2% overall (maxilla 33.3% to 94%, mandible 50% to 75%). Table 3 conclusion: early extraction of compromised FPM leads to decrease in post extraction space (Category III…6 studiesUngraded
Portland cement (PC) vs Full strength formocresol (FC)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.80 [0.23, 2.73]1 study · 70 participantsUngraded
Total-etching 36% phosphoric acid + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Non-rinse conditioner + acetone-based total-etch adhesive
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 7.00 [0.38, 127.33]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Older adults (population mean age >33.4 years) vs Younger adults (population mean age <=33.4 years)
Dental caries experience (DMFT) · Adults aged 19-60 years · Older (mean age >33.4 years)
Socioeconomic Factors and Caries in People between 19 and 60 Years of Age: An Update of a Systematic Review… (2018)
MEAN 11.50 [6.49, 16.51]7 studiesUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.88]1 study · 62 participantsUngraded
Human Development Index (quantitative) vs Not applicable
Mean DMFT · Adult participants in 25 meta-regression studies · Model 2 adjusted
Socioeconomic Factors and Caries in People between 19 and 60 Years of Age: An Update of a Systematic Review… (2018)
Meta-regression coefficient 6.9019067 studiesUngraded
Primary education vs University education
Mean number of decayed teeth (mean DT) · Adults aged 25 years and older in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States · 2009, New Zealand
Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. (2018)
AD 0.80 [0.41, 1.20]1 study · 2041 participantsUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
NPV for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
NPV 85.011 studiesUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Ferric sulphate (FS)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.58 [0.25, 1.36]3 studies · 130 participantsLow
Radiographic caries detection vs Reference standard (often histological; also invasive opening)
Advanced proximal carious lesions · Permanent molar surfaces in diagnostic accuracy studies (mostly in vitro; clinical) · Tailored meta-analysis (Egypt)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 9.82 [7.3, 13.3]22 studiesUngraded
Calcium hydroxide + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.63 [0.23, 1.70]1 study · 62 participantsUngraded
Low polymerization shrinkage resin composite (silorane, ormocer, bulk-fill or other modified-monomer composite) vs Conventional methacrylate-based resin composite
Marginal adaptation (clinically detectable deterioration) · People with permanent posterior teeth restored with class I or II direct restorations · 24 months
Meta-analysis of the clinical behavior of posterior direct resin restorations: Low polymerization shrinkage… (2018)
Odds ratio (OR) 1.46 [0.92, 2.33]7 studiesUngraded
Self-etch adhesive + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Total-etching 36% phosphoric acid + acetone-based total-etch adhesive
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.04, 2.94]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) vs 1:5 diluted formocresol (FC)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.86 [0.52, 6.59]2 studies · 150 participantsUngraded
Calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) vs Calcium sulphate hemihydrate (DentoGen)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.67 [0.46, 6.06]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Biodentine vs Propolis
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.81]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.04, 2.94]1 study · 80 participantsUngraded
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Sealapex (eugenol-free calcium hydroxide)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.20 [0.01, 3.92]1 study · 40 participantsUngraded