Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

515 questions in 31 reviews · Fertility Regulation

current versions
No studies 99 · 19.2%Ungraded 11 · 2.1%Very low 70 · 13.6%Low 147 · 28.5%Moderate 153 · 29.7%High 35 · 6.8%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Change in weight (kg): 1 year; 2 years; 3 years · women with need for contraception
Progestin‐only contraceptives: effects on weight (2016) · Cochrane
MD 2.28 [1.79, 2.77]758 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Change in weight (kg): 1 year; 4 years; 10 years · women with need for contraception
Progestin‐only contraceptives: effects on weight (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1277 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Change in fat mass (%); change in lean mass (%) · women with need for contraception
Progestin‐only contraceptives: effects on weight (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted76 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Change in fat mass (%); change in fat free mass (%) · women with need for contraception
Progestin‐only contraceptives: effects on weight (2016) · Cochrane
MD 1.6 [0.45, 2.75]60 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Change in fat mass (%); change in fat free mass (%) · perimenopausal women with need for contraception
Progestin‐only contraceptives: effects on weight (2016) · Cochrane
MD 3.3 [2.08, 4.52]68 participantsLow
Intervention NR
OC: oral contraceptive · perimenopausal women with need for contraception
Progestin‐only contraceptives: effects on weight (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Contraceptive use (modern method) · women with need for family planning (FP)
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV (2016) · Cochrane
OR 2.48 [1.31, 4.72]335 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Contraceptive use: more effective method · women with need for family planning (FP)
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.81 [1.24, 2.63]18 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Contraceptive use: highly effective method · women with need for family planning (FP)
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV (2016) · Cochrane
OR 2.25 [1.24, 4.1]18 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Condom use: unprotected last sex · women with need for family planning (FP)
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.23 [0.14, 0.4]18 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Condom use: any unprotected sex in past 2 weeks · women with need for family planning (FP)
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.56 [0.32, 0.99]18 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Pregnancy incidence, undesired · women with need for family planning (FP)
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted939 participantsModerate
Clindamycin vs penicillin plus chloramphenicol compared to for
Fever index (mean degree‐hour) ‐ all women · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 77 participantsModerate
Tetracycline vs penicillin G
Leukocytosis resolution time (days) · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Pelvic abscess, salpingitis, urinary tract infection · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
RR 4.32 [0.51, 36.95]1 study · 77 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Treatment failure · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
RR 5.39 [0.27, 108.8]1 study · 77 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Drug reaction · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
RR 3.24 [0.14, 77.06]1 study · 77 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Phlebitis · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.36 [0.02, 8.56]1 study · 77 participantsModerate
Clindamycin vs penicillin plus chloramphenicol compared to for
Fever index (mean degree‐hour) ‐ bacteraemic patients · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 29 participantsModerate
Clindamycin vs penicillin plus chloramphenicol compared to for
Duration of hospitalisation · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 77 participantsModerate
Clindamycin vs penicillin plus chloramphenicol compared to for
Complications · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
RR 7.57 [0.98, 58.61]1 study · 77 participantsModerate
Penicillin plus chloramphenicol vs cephalothin plus kanamycin
Time to fever resolution (mean time) · patients with treating septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 56 participantsLow
Penicillin plus chloramphenicol vs cephalothin plus kanamycin
Absence of fever during D&C (mean time) · patients with treating septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 56 participantsLow
Antibiotics after D&C vs D&C during antibiotics
Absence of fever (degree‐hour) ‐ Clindamycin after D&C versus D&C during clindamycin · patients with treating septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 37 participantsModerate
Antibiotics after D&C vs D&C during antibiotics
Absence of fever (degree‐hour) ‐ Penicillin + chloramphenicol after D&C versus D&C during penicillin + chloramphenicol therapy) · patients with treating septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsModerate
Tetracycline vs penicillin G
Fever resolution time (days) · patients with septic abortion
Antibiotics for treating septic abortion (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsLow
Counseling + phone follow‐up vs counseling
Counseling + phone · young women, 16 to 24 years old, with desire to avoid pregnancy
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.41 [1.06, 1.87]767 participantsModerate
Counseling + phone follow‐up vs counseling
Counseling + phone · young women, 16 to 24 years old, with desire to avoid pregnancy
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.45 [1.03, 2.03]767 participantsModerate
Enhanced counseling vs standard care
Use of effective contraceptive method at 6 months · young women with need for contraception
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people (2016) · Cochrane
OR 2.03 [1.04, 3.98]2336 participantsLow
Enhanced counseling vs standard care
Condom use at 6 months: consistent; correct; consistent and correct · young women with need for contraception
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2336 participantsLow
Enhanced counseling vs standard care
Effective user of contraception at 1 year · young women with need for contraception
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people (2016) · Cochrane
OR 48.38 [5.96, 392.63]78 participantsVery low
Counseling + audiovisual tool vs usual care
Effectiveness of method used at last intercourse (at 1 year) sexually active at · young men or women with need for contraception
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.511195 participantsVery low
Counseling + audiovisual tool vs usual care
Partner's use of OC at last intercourse (at 1 year) sexually active at · young men or women with need for contraception
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.661195 participantsVery low
Counseling + audiovisual tool vs usual care
No OC use (by 1 year) Chicago site · young men or women with need for contraception
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted949 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Use of effective contraceptive during last sex: after year 1; 12 months after year 2 · middle or high school students with need for contraceptive information
School‐based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted20 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Condom use at last sex: after year 1; 12 months after year 2 · middle or high school students with need for contraceptive information
School‐based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted20 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Frequency of sex without condom in last 3 months: after year 1; 12 months after year 2 · middle or high school students with need for contraceptive information
School‐based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted20 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
No condom use at last vaginal sex (3 months) · middle or high school students with need for contraceptive information
School‐based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.67 [0.47, 0.96]15 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Vaginal sex without condom in past 3 months (3 months) · middle or high school students with need for contraceptive information
School‐based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.59 [0.36, 0.95]15 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
No condom use at last vaginal sex: 3 months; 15 months · middle or high school students with need for contraceptive information
School‐based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted15 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Oral contraceptive use during last sex (17 months) · middle or high school students with need for contraceptive information
School‐based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.57 [0.36, 0.91]102 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Second birth (by 24 months) · women with postpartum status
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.41 [0.17, 1]149 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Contraception use (at 6 months): immediate session vs no immediate session · women with postpartum status
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.62 [1.06, 2.5]393 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Effective contraception use (at 6 months) · women with postpartum status
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 3.24 [1.35, 7.79]124 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Expulsion by 6 months · postpartum women with desire for contraceptive
Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1 [0.2, 5.04]1 study · 30 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
IUC use at 6 months · postpartum women with desire for contraceptive
Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.46 [0.04, 5.75]1 study · 30 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Placement per protocol · postpartum women with desire for contraceptive
Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception (2015) · Cochrane
OR 4.07 [0.54, 30.4]4 studies · 243 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Expulsion by 6 months · postpartum women with desire for contraceptive
Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception (2015) · Cochrane
OR 4.89 [1.47, 16.32]4 studies · 210 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
IUC use at 6 months · postpartum women with desire for contraceptive
Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception (2015) · Cochrane
OR 2.04 [1.01, 4.09]4 studies · 243 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Pain score at tenaculum placement (10 cm or 100 mm VAS) · women with IUC being inserted
Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 345 participantsHigh