Intervention not reported
Autism symptom severity Measured by: parent‐reported autism symptoms on standardised autism screening and diagnostic instruments (lower scores indicate less severe autism symptoms) · patients with young children (less than six years old) with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)
1 finding from 1 review
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) or Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) scores · concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users
1 finding from 1 review
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) or Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) scores · concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users
1 finding from 1 review
Resource use: total cost per patient receiving mammography screening · women aged 60 to 84 years at study entry. (Age of participants matches our selection criteria)
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
41 participants
High
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening Multimodal/complex intervention versus usual care at 12 months · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention leads to higher behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening Multimodal/complex… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening IVR versus enhanced usual care at median · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention showed no clear difference in behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening IVR versus enhanced… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening Multimodal/complex intervention versus usual care at median · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention leads to higher behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening Multimodal/complex… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR versus usual care at 6‐month · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention probably leads to higher behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR versus usual… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR, unidirectional ATCS versus usual care or letter at longer (9‐12 months) · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention showed no clear difference in behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR, unidirectional… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: cervical cancer screening ATCS Plus versus control (no calls) at 3 month · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
1 finding from 1 review
Denver Developmental Screening Test more than 30 days of commencement of therapy · children less than 3 years of age with iron deficiency anaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Health outcomes: Drug misuse and dependence CAGE screening tool. Scale from 0 to 4. Higher score indicates greater probability of drug misuse or dependence · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers
1 finding from 1 review
Health service outcome: uptake of preventive screening · Adultsa
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Perception ‐ screening message (measured as rating on a scale of perceived effectiveness) · consumers
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Persuasiveness ‐ screening message (measured as a hypothetical decision or intention or willingness to adopt an intervention) · consumers
1 finding from 1 review
Toluidine blue (visual staining) vs No screening
Outcome not reported · Planned population: general population or high-risk / opportunistic screening groups (no eligible study)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Brush biopsy (oral cytology) vs No screening
Outcome not reported · Planned population: general population or high-risk / opportunistic screening groups (no eligible study)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Fluorescence imaging / light-based techniques vs No screening
Outcome not reported · Planned population: general population or high-risk / opportunistic screening groups (no eligible study)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Congruence between informed values and choice ‐ all studies Based on the proportion of participants who made a decision that aligned with what was most important to them. Assessed soon after exposure to the decision aid. · adults considering treatment or screening decisions
Patient decision aids probably leads to higher congruence between informed values and choice ‐ all studies Based on… compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge · adults considering treatment or screening decisions
1 finding from 1 review