Cochrane · systematic review · CD009677
Mobile clinics for women's and children's health
Abdel‐Aleem, H, El‐Gibaly, OMH, EL‐Gazzar, AFES, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
Effective Practice and Organisation of CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
6
Included studies
NR
No studies 6 · 60%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 30%Moderate 0 · 0%High 1 · 10%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Mobile clinics versus static clinics for mammography screening
Population: women aged 60 to 84 years at study entry. (Age of participants matches our selection criteria)
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Health status and well‐being Mobile clinics vs static clinics | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Health behaviour: self‐reported mammography uptake ( Mobile clinics vs static clinics | OR 1.83 [1.22, 2.74] | 1 study · 473 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Utilisation, coverage or access Mobile clinics vs static clinics | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Resource use: total cost per patient receiving mammography screening Mobile clinics vs static clinics | no estimate extracted | 41 participants | High |
Satisfaction with care among healthcare recipients Mobile clinics vs static clinics | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Mobile clinics versus standard static services for childhood asthma care
Population: children aged 2 to 6 years with persistent asthma and their caregivers. (Age of participants matches our selection criteria)
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Health status and well‐being ( Mobile clinics vs standard static services | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 322 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Health behaviour ( Mobile clinics vs standard static services | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 322 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Utilisation, coverage or access Mobile clinics vs standard static services | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Resource use Mobile clinics vs standard static services | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Satisfaction with care among health care recipients Mobile clinics vs standard static services | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |