Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3,703 questions · 3,824 findings · 858 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 573 · 15%GRADE not reported 383 · 10%Very low 993 · 26%Low 1,062 · 27.8%Moderate 614 · 16.1%High 199 · 5.2%

Retrievable vena caval filters with anticoagulation vs anticoagulation

Major bleedingd (3 months) · participants who sustained multiple traumatic injuriesa

1 finding from 1 review

Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 240 participants
Moderate

Retrievable vena caval filters with anticoagulation vs anticoagulation

Recurrent PE · participants who sustained multiple traumatic injuriesa

1 finding from 1 review

Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 80 participants
Moderate

Retrievable vena caval filters with anticoagulation vs anticoagulation

Mortality from any cause (up to 90 days) · participants who sustained multiple traumatic injuriesa

1 finding from 1 review

Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 240 participants
Moderate

Retrievable vena caval filters with anticoagulation vs anticoagulation

Lower extremity venous thrombosis confirmed by Doppler ultrasound or venography (at 14 days) · participants who sustained multiple traumatic injuriesa

1 finding from 1 review

Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 240 participants
Moderate

Retrievable vena caval filters with anticoagulation vs anticoagulation

Filter‐related complications (up to 232 days) · participants who sustained multiple traumatic injuriesa

1 finding from 1 review

Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 240 participants
Moderate

Work‐directed plus clinical intervention vs care

Sickness absence days, medium‐term

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 1292 participants
Moderate

Improved care vs care

Sickness absence days, medium‐term · Depressed persons

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 1912 participants
Moderate

Work‐directed intervention vs care

Sickness absence days, medium‐term · Depressed persons

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 130 participants
Low

Psychological interventions vs care

Sickness absence days, medium‐term · Depressed persons

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 1649 participants
Low

Cooling treatment (ice pack) vs no treatment

Maternal views and experiences of treatment ‐ Satisfaction with overall perineal care (good + very good + excellent) Day 10 · Women with perineal trauma (tear or episiotomy, or both) sustained during childbirth

It is very uncertain whether cooling treatment (ice pack or cold gel pad) changes maternal views and experiences of treatment ‐ Satisfaction with… compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Local cooling for relieving pain from perineal trauma sustained during childbirth 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.07 [0.97, 1.18]
1 study · 308 participants
Very low

Cooling treatment (ice pack) vs cooling treatment (cold gel pad)

It is very uncertain whether cooling treatment (ice pack) changes maternal views and experiences with treatment ‐ Satisfaction with… compared with cooling treatment (cold gel pad) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Local cooling for relieving pain from perineal trauma sustained during childbirth 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.82 [0.73, 0.92]
1 study · 208 participants
Very low

Oscillating devices vs different oscillating devices

Sputum: weight (dry or wet) (g) · adults and children with cystic fibrosis

1 finding from 1 review

Oscillating devices for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Low

High vs moderate protein concentration of human milk fortifier

Rate of weight gain (g/kg/day) · promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of different protein concentrations of human milk fortifier for promoting growth and neurological… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 606 participants
Moderate

Moderate vs low protein concentration of human milk fortifier

Rate of weight gain (g/kg/day) · preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of different protein concentrations of human milk fortifier for promoting growth and neurological… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 176 participants
Very low

Home vs inpatient induction with controlled release PGE

Neonatal infection · women having induction of labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Home vs inpatient induction with controlled release PGE

Serious neonatal morbidity or mortality (up to 28 days)№ of participants: (0 RCTs) · women having induction of labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Home vs inpatient induction with balloon or Foley catheter

Neonatal infection · women having induction of labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Home vs inpatient induction with balloon or Foley catheter

Serious neonatal morbidity or mortality (up to 28 days)№ of participants: (0 RCTs) · women having induction of labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Home vs inpatient induction with vaginal PGE

Neonatal infection · women having induction of labour at term

It is very uncertain whether home changes neonatal infection (up to 28 days)№ of participants: 821(1 RCT) compared with inpatient induction with vaginal PGE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.29 [0.59, 2.82]
Studies not reported
Very low

Home vs inpatient induction with vaginal PGE

Serious neonatal morbidity or mortality (up to 28 days)№ of participants: (0 RCTs) · women having induction of labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found