evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,776 questions · 7,311 findings · 959 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 1,498 · 20.5%GRADE not reported 303 · 4.1%Very low 1,839 · 25.2%Low 1,991 · 27.2%Moderate 1,277 · 17.5%High 403 · 5.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Alternative mouse alone vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of upper body disorders (neck, shoulder, and upper extremity) Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Alternative mouse alone showed no clear difference in incidence of upper body disorder (neck, shoulder and upper… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative mouse alone vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of neck/shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Alternative mouse alone showed no clear difference in incidence of neck or shoulderdisorder Questionnaire followed by… compared with conventional mouse alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative mouse alone vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of right upper extremity disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Alternative mouse alone showed no clear difference in incidence of right upper extremity disorder Questionnaire followed… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support combined with alternative mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of neck/shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support combined with alternative mouse probably leads to lower incidence of neck or shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support combined with alternative mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of right upper extremity disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support combined with alternative mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of right upper extremity disorder Questionnaire followed… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support with conventional mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of upper body disorders Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support with conventional mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of upper body disorders Questionnaire followed by medical… compared with conventional mouse alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support with conventional mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of neck/shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support with conventional mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of neck or shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by… compared with conventional mouse alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support with conventional mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of right upper extremity disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support with conventional mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of right upper extremity disorders Questionnaire followed… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Autism symptom severity Measured by: parent‐reported autism symptoms on standardised autism screening and diagnostic instruments (lower scores indicate less severe autism symptoms) · patients with young children (less than six years old) with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)
1 finding from 1 review

Physical and cognitive therapy vs usual care

Cognitive functioning b) Executve functioning (DEX score) (scores range from 0 to 80. Lower scores indicate better functioning) (DEX) · critically ill patients 18 years or older treated for respiratory failure or septic or both, cardiogenic or haemorrhagic shock who resided…
1 finding from 1 review

Provision of maize flour or maize flour products fortified with iron plus other vitamins and minerals vs unfortified maize flours or maize flour products

Anaemia · general population older than 2 years of age (including pregnant women), in Kenya and Mexico

It is very uncertain whether provision of maize flour or maize flour products fortified with iron… changes anaemia (defined as haemoglobin (Hb) below WHO cut‐off, adjusted for… compared with unfortified maize flours or maize flour products (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review