Cochrane · systematic review · CD009315
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non‐alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption
Crockett, RA, King, SE, Marteau, TM, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library
Public HealthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 50%Low 3 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings table
Population: university students/staff and general consumers
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Food purchased from vending machines | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 1 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Food purchased from a grocery store | no estimate extracted | 1 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness |
Food purchased in restaurants (labels on menus) | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 1877 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Food consumed in laboratory settings (labels on menus or labels placed on a range of food options) | no estimate extracted | 8 studies · 1705 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Food consumed in laboratory settings (single snack food or drink option) | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 732 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness |
Potential harms (high‐energy snack foods consumed with misleading low fat/energy labels in laboratory settings) | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 831 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |