What do systematic reviews say?

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
• Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  105 participants
  Very low

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

• Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  754 participants
  Very low

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

• Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  224 participants
  Very low

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

• Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  271 participants
  Very low

Professional interventions vs usual care

Professional interventions showed no clear difference in number of hospital admissions compared with standard/usual care (moderate certainty).

• Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.24 [0.79, 1.96]
  3889 participants
  Moderate
• Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.99 [0.92, 1.06]
  3661 participants
  High

Professional interventions vs usual care

Professional interventions showed no clear difference in number of emergency department visits compared with standard/usual care (low certainty).

• Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.71 [0.5, 1.02]
  1067 participants
  Low

Professional interventions vs usual care

Professional interventions showed no clear difference in mortality compared with standard/usual care (moderate certainty).

• Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.98 [0.82, 1.17]
  3538 participants
  Moderate

Organisational interventions vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether organisational interventions changes number of hospital admissions compared with standard/usual care (very low certainty).

• Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.85 [0.71, 1.03]
  6203 participants
  Very low
• Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.92 [0.86, 0.99]
  152237 participants
  Low

Organisational interventions vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether organisational interventions changes number of emergency department visits compared with standard/usual care (very low certainty).

• Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.75 [0.49, 1.15]
  1819 participants
  Very low

Organisational interventions vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether organisational interventions changes mortality compared with standard/usual care (very low certainty).

• Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.94 [0.85, 1.03]
  154962 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services

• Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services plus CCM

• Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 participants
  GRADE not reported

Manual paper reminders vs usual care

• Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  39 studies · 40346 participants
  Moderate

Manual paper reminders vs usual care

• Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  8 studies · 3263 participants
  Low

Manual paper reminders vs usual care

• Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 8390 participants
  Very low

Manual paper reminders vs usual care

• Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 1222 participants
  Very low

Manual paper reminders vs usual care

• Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 2570 participants
  Low

Manual paper reminders vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care

Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions may leads to higher recovery from CMDs ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post… compared with usual care (low certainty).

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.29 [1.06, 1.56]
  2 studies · 308 participants
  Low

Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual care or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found