Cochrane · systematic review · CD003942

Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors

Khalil, H, Bell, B, Chambers, H, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
8
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 37.5%Low 2 · 25%Moderate 2 · 25%High 1 · 12.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Professional interventions compared to standard/usual care for prevention of medication errors

Population: adults receiving medication in primary care
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of hospital admissions
Professional interventions vs standard/usual care
RR 1.24 [0.79, 1.96]3889 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Number of people admitted to hospital
Professional interventions vs standard/usual care
RR 0.99 [0.92, 1.06]3661 participantsHigh
Number of emergency department visits
Professional interventions vs standard/usual care
RR 0.71 [0.5, 1.02]1067 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Mortality
Professional interventions vs standard/usual care
RR 0.98 [0.82, 1.17]3538 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Organisational interventions compared to standard/usual care for prevention of medication errors

Population: adults receiving medication in primary care
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of hospital admissions
Organisational interventions vs standard/usual care
RR 0.85 [0.71, 1.03]6203 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Number of people admitted to hospital
Organisational interventions vs standard/usual care
RR 0.92 [0.86, 0.99]152237 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Number of emergency department visits
Organisational interventions vs standard/usual care
RR 0.75 [0.49, 1.15]1819 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Mortality
Organisational interventions vs standard/usual care
RR 0.94 [0.85, 1.03]154962 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision