evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,736 questions · 15,265 findings · 1,163 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 3,871 · 25.4%GRADE not reported 810 · 5.3%Very low 4,242 · 27.8%Low 3,879 · 25.4%Moderate 1,999 · 13.1%High 464 · 3%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Steroid implant vs sham

Proportion of participants with elevated IOP or receiving intervention · people with chronic non‐infectious uveitis

Steroid implant probably leads to higher proportion of participants with elevated IOP or receiving intervention compared with sham procedure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Technical difficulties · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes technical difficulties with the intervention at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses vs non blue‐light filtering IOL

Proportion of participants with adverse events with a probable causal link with the study interventions at six months · adults

Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses may leads to lower proportion of participants with adverse events with a probable… compared with non‐blue‐light filtering lenses (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pain intensity measured on CHQ (0‐100; 0 = worse pain), and VAS (0 to 100; 0 = no pain) Postintervention: first assessment after end of treatment; no later than 3 months · children and adolescents aged 4 years to 18 years, with chronic musculoskeletal pain
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measured on multiple scales (0 to 100; higher score = better quality of life) Postintervention: first assessment after end of treatment; no later than 3 months · children and adolescents aged 4 years to 18 years, with chronic musculoskeletal pain
1 finding from 1 review

Phacoemulsification vs laser peripheral iridotomy

Proportion of participants requiring further IOP‐lowering interventions (additional surgery, medications, or both) (lower number of events is better) · Participants with acute primary angle closure after initial medical treatment to lower intraocular pressure

It is very uncertain whether phacoemulsification changes proportion of participants requiring further IOP‐lowering… compared with laser peripheral iridotomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review