Cochrane · systematic review · CD015122

Tranexamic acid for percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Cleveland, B, Norling, B, Wang, H, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

UrologyAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
18
current version
GRADE rated
16
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 2 · 11.1%Very low 1 · 5.6%Low 8 · 44.4%Moderate 7 · 38.9%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Systemic TXA compared to No TXA (placebo or usual care) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Population: percutaneous nephrolithotomy
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Blood transfusion
Systemic TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 0.45 [0.27, 0.76]9 studies · 1353 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Stone‐free rate
Systemic TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 1.11 [0.98, 1.27]4 studies · 603 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Thromboembolic events
Systemic TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
06 studies · 841 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events
Systemic TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 5.22 [0.52, 52.72]4 studies · 602 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Secondary interventions
Systemic TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 1.15 [0.84, 1.57]2 studies · 319 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Major surgical complications
Systemic TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 0.36 [0.21, 0.62]5 studies · 733 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Minor surgical complications
Systemic TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 0.71 [0.45, 1.1]5 studies · 733 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Unplanned hospitalizations or readmissions
Systemic TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 1.55 [0.45, 5.31]1 study · 189 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Hospital length of stay
Systemic TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
no estimate extracted7 studies · 1151 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Topical TXA compared to No TXA (placebo or usual care) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Population: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Blood transfusion
Topical TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 0.4 [0.2, 0.81]1 study · 400 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Stone‐free rate
Topical TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 1.07 [0.99, 1.17]1 study · 400 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Thromboembolic events
Topical TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RD 01 study · 400 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse event
Topical TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RD 01 study · 400 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Secondary interventions
Topical TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Major surgical complications
Topical TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 0.69 [0.45, 1.06]1 study · 400 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Minor surgical complications
Topical TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
RR 0.73 [0.59, 0.91]1 study · 400 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Unplanned hospitalizations or readmissions
Topical TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Hospital length of stay
Topical TXA vs No TXA (placebo or usual care)
no estimate extracted1 study · 400 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias