Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,411 questions · 2,571 findings · 265 reviews

No studies found 543 · 21.1%GRADE not reported 169 · 6.6%Very low 676 · 26.3%Low 731 · 28.4%Moderate 399 · 15.5%High 53 · 2.1%

Ultrafiltration (UF) vs usual care

Heart failure‐related rehospitalisation · people with AHF

Ultrafiltration (UF) showed no clear difference in heart failure‐related rehospitalisation compared with usual care (UC) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrafiltration (UF) vs usual care

New initiation of renal replacement therapy – at longest available · people with AHF

Ultrafiltration (UF) showed no clear difference in new initiation of renal replacement therapy – at longest available compared with usual care (UC) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrafiltration (UF) vs usual care

Complications of central line insertion – in hospital · people with AHF

It is very uncertain whether ultrafiltration (UF) changes complications of central line insertion – in hospital compared with usual care (UC) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

CBT vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

Mental distress · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) showed no clear difference in psychological distress at follow-up compared with usual care, waiting list or no treatment (control) (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs usual care or no treatment

Diabetic complications · People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs usual care or no treatment

Adverse effects of treatment · People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age
1 finding from 1 review

Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs usual care or no treatment

Resource implications (e.g. cost of incontinence management methods) · People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs usual care or no treatment

Clinical attachment level (CAL) · People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age

Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without… led to lower clinical attachment level (CAL) compared with no active intervention/usual care; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review