Question · asked by 1 review

Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs usual care or no treatment: Adverse effects of treatment

Population
People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age
Intervention
Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery)
Comparison
usual care or no treatment
Outcome
Adverse effects of treatment

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs No active intervention/usual care
Adverse effects of treatment · People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age · 3-4 months
Treatment of periodontitis for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
SoF comment: insufficient evidence to determine whether SRP for glycaemic control is associated with any harms; most studies did not evaluate adverse effects. Where reported (e.g. D'Aiuto 2018) serious adverse events…Not reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Treatment of periodontitis for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-09Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.