Cochrane · systematic review · CD013327

Upper limb exercise for arteriovenous fistula maturation in people requiring permanent haemodialysis access

Nantakool, S, Reanpang, T, Prasannarong, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

Kidney and TransplantAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
13
current version
GRADE rated
9
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 30.8%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 23.1%Low 6 · 46.2%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Upper limb exercise training versus control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise) for arteriovenous fistula maturation

Population: CKD patients who underwent AVF creation
13 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Time to mature
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ultrasound maturation (isotonic exercise training versus no intervention)
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
RR 1.09 [0.94, 1.25]2 studies · 263 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Ultrasound maturation (isometric versus isotonic exercise training)
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
RR 1.56 [1.21, 2]3 studies · 160 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Clinical maturation (isotonic exercise training versus no intervention)
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
RR 1.14 [1.02, 1.27]2 studies · 263 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Clinical maturation (isometric versus isotonic exercise training)
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
RR 1.8 [1.18, 2.76]3 studies · 160 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Venous diameter (isometric versus isotonic exercise training)
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 160 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Venous diameter (high volume versus low volume isotonic exercise training)
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 93 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Blood flow in the inflow artery (isometric versus isotonic exercise training)
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 160 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Blood flow in the inflow artery (high volume versus low volume isotonic exercise training)
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Dialysis efficacy indicator
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vascular access function
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vascular access complications (isometric versus isotonic exercise training)
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
RR 2.54 [0.38, 17.08]2 studies · 110 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events
Upper limb exercise training vs control (no intervention/usual care/isotonic exercise)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies