Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Every word you type has to appear somewhere in the question, and the closest matches are ranked first.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

75,239 questions in 5,342 reviews

current versions
No studies 15,213 · 20.2%Ungraded 10,323 · 13.7%Very low 17,528 · 23.3%Low 17,951 · 23.9%Moderate 11,190 · 14.9%High 3,034 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events during treatment · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Health‐related quality of life · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Proportion of people with disease progression · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs no block
Mean difference in postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours postoperatively (VAS 0 to 10) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted17 studies · 958 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs serratus anterior plane block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.06, 15.59]2 studies · 110 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs pectoralis plane block
Mean difference in postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours postoperatively (VAS 0 to 10) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 98 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs pectoralis plane block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 47 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs quadratus lumborum block
Mean difference in postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours postoperatively (VAS 0 to 10) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs quadratus lumborum block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs intercostal nerve block
Mean difference in postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours postoperatively (VAS 0 to 10) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 131 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs intercostal nerve block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.09 [0.04, 2.28]3 studies · 181 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs epidural analgesia
Mean difference in postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours postoperatively (VAS 0 to 10) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 81 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs epidural analgesia
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs no block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.4, 2.49]18 studies · 1045 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs placebo block
Mean difference in postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours postoperatively (VAS 0 to 10) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 499 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs placebo block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.29, 3.41]10 studies · 592 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs paravertebral block
Mean difference in postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours postoperatively (VAS 0 to 10) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 478 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs paravertebral block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.1 [0.02, 0.55]7 studies · 522 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs transversus abdominis plane block
Mean difference in postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours postoperatively (VAS 0 to 10) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 160 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs transversus abdominis plane block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.15, 6.84]4 studies · 202 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs serratus anterior plane block
Mean difference in postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours postoperatively (VAS 0 to 10) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Rate of falls · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related injuries Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1422 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related fractures Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1422 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more falls resulting in hospital admission Measured using hospital records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7179 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Adverse events · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Cost‐effectiveness (economic analysis) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Rate of falls Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) or hospital records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4197 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Number of fallers Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3047 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related injuries Measured using healthcare centre records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted67300 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related fractures Measured using hospital injury record system · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted24365 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Number of people experiencing 1 or more falls resulting in hospital admission Measured using hospital records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of fallers · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Adverse events · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Cost‐effectiveness (economic analysis) Measured using healthcare records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted163683 participantsVery low
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related injuries · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related fractures · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more falls resulting in hospital admission Measured using Danish Hospital Registration Database · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4542 participantsVery low
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people who experienced 1 or more adverse events · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Economic analysis · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Rate of falls Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1422 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of fallers Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1422 participantsVery low
Shared decision‐making (all components) vs control
Satisfaction with the decision‐making process · women aged 40 to 75 years at average to moderate risk of breast cancer
Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Some components of shared decision‐making, including clarification of values and preferences, vs control
Knowledge of all the options · women aged 38 to 71 years at average to moderate risk of breast cancer
Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 2114 participantsLow
Some components of shared decision‐making, including clarification of values and preferences, vs control
Adherence to the chosen option · women aged 38 to 71 years at average to moderate risk of breast cancer
Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Some components of shared decision‐making, including clarification of values and preferences, vs control
Choice of an option aligned with each woman’s values and preferences · women aged 38 to 71 years at average to moderate risk of breast cancer
Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Some components of shared decision‐making, including clarification of values and preferences, vs control
Woman's involvement · women aged 38 to 71 years at average to moderate risk of breast cancer
Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Some components of shared decision‐making, including clarification of values and preferences, vs control
Mental health outcomes · women aged 38 to 71 years at average to moderate risk of breast cancer
Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening (2024) · Cochrane
MD 0.542 studies · 749 participantsLow
Studies focused only on enhanced communication, without clarification of values and preferences, vs control
Satisfaction with the decision‐making process · women aged 40 to 75 years old at average to moderate risk of breast cancer
Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Studies focused only on enhanced communication, without clarification of values and preferences, vs control
Confidence in the decision made · women aged 40 to 75 years old at average to moderate risk of breast cancer
Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening (2024) · Cochrane
MD 2.892 studies · 1191 participantsLow