Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,935 questions · 1,986 findings · 260 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 503 · 25.3%GRADE not reported 76 · 3.8%Very low 593 · 29.9%Low 509 · 25.6%Moderate 241 · 12.1%High 64 · 3.2%

Augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with ziprasidone (40 mg/d to 160 mg/d) vs augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with placebo or continue on SSRI monotherapy

Response (≥ 50% reduction in MADRS or HAM‐D score) ‐ Any dose · treatment‐resistant depression in adults

Augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with ziprasidone (40… probably leads to higher response (≥ 50% reduction in MADRS/HAM‐D score) ‐ Any dose compared with augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with placebo or… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with ziprasidone (40 mg/d to 160 mg/d) vs augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with placebo or continue on SSRI monotherapy

Remission · treatment‐resistant depression in adults

Augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with ziprasidone (40… showed no clear difference in remission (clinician‐rated) ‐ Any dose compared with augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with placebo or… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with ziprasidone (40 mg/d to 160 mg/d) vs augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI) with placebo or continue on SSRI monotherapy

Quality of life ‐ not measured · treatment‐resistant depression in adults

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Combination of lidocaine intraperitoneal instillation plus intramuscular morphine vs placebo

Number of women requiring rescue medication · women undergoing PPTL under local anaesthesia

Combination of intraperitoneal lidocaine instillation and… may leads to lower number of women requiring rescue medication compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Protein vs standard diet

Gastrointestinal adverse events · patients (> 65 years) following hip fracture; patients with a recent stroke

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Protein changes side effects: at least one adverse gastrointestinal event compared with standard diet (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet

Gastrointestinal adverse events · long‐term care patients; inpatients without dehydration with energy intake by tube feeding; patients with pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients changes side effects: at least one adverse gastrointestinal event compared with standard diet (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants vs standard diet or placebo

Gastrointestinal adverse events · residents of long‐term care (≥ 65 years) with pressure ulcers; inpatients with pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants changes side effects: at least one adverse gastrointestinal event compared with standard diet or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet

Gastrointestinal adverse events · malnourished patients with pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients changes side effects: at least one adverse gastrointestinal event compared with standard diet (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Collagen vs standard diet or placebo

Adverse effects/events: at least 1 adverse effect ‐ as defined by individual studies. · adults with pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Collagen changes side effects: at least one adverse event compared with standard diet or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo

Risk for at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) per participant · patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus

Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists may leads to higher risk for at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) per patient compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo

Risk for at least one adverse event per patient · patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron changes risk for at least one adverse event per patient compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo

Risk for at least one adverse event per patient · patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus

Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin may leads to higher risk for at least one adverse event per patient compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo

Risk for at least one adverse event per patient · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin changes risk for at least one adverse event per patient compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review