Cochrane · systematic review · CD008320

Pharmacological interventions for pruritus in adult palliative care patients

Boehlke, C, Joos, L, Coune, B, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care3 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
61
current version
GRADE rated
22
No studies
38
Included studies
NR
No studies 38 · 62.3%Ungraded 1 · 1.6%Very low 8 · 13.1%Low 12 · 19.7%Moderate 1 · 1.6%High 1 · 1.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 3 versions

Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: health problem or population
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
no estimate extracted5 studies · 297 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
RR 2.63 [0.76, 9.05]1 study · 15 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin versus pregabalin for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
no estimate extracted2 studies · 100 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
RR 4.7 [0.21, 104.14]2 studies · 122 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1292 participantsHigh
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
RR 1.73 [1.2, 2.48]5 studies · 1344 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cholestatic (CP)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extracted4 studies · 202 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
RR 2.54 [0.38, 16.78]3 studies · 174 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 87 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Prurits
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extracted4 studies · 212 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 76 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 160 participantsUngraded

Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 100 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
RR 1.28 [0.02, 106.52]2 studies · 122 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 112 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
RR 3.69 [1.17, 11.67]3 studies · 116 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone versus placebo for patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)

Population: patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
PruritusScale from: 0 to 10
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 52 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
RR 2.67 [1.32, 5.39]1 study · 40 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin versus placebo for patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)

Population: patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 42 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
RR 0.29 [0.03, 2.51]1 study · 39 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol versus placebo for patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)

Population: patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus: significant improvement
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
RR 2.32 [0.54, 10.1]2 studies · 69 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies