Cochrane · systematic review · CD008320

Pharmacological interventions for pruritus in adult palliative care patients

Boehlke, C, Joos, L, Coune, B, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care3 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
61
current version
GRADE rated
22
No studies
38
Included studies
NR
No studies 38 · 62.3%Ungraded 1 · 1.6%Very low 8 · 13.1%Low 12 · 19.7%Moderate 1 · 1.6%High 1 · 1.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Current version only

Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: health problem or population
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
no estimate extracted5 studies · 297 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ GABA‐analogues vs placebo
RR 2.63 [0.76, 9.05]1 study · 15 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin versus pregabalin for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
no estimate extracted2 studies · 100 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Gabapentin vs pregabalin
RR 4.7 [0.21, 104.14]2 studies · 122 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1292 participantsHigh
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Kappa‐opioid agonists vs placebo
RR 1.73 [1.2, 2.48]5 studies · 1344 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cholestatic (CP)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extracted4 studies · 202 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Ondansetron vs placebo
RR 2.54 [0.38, 16.78]3 studies · 174 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 87 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Montelukast vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Prurits
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extracted4 studies · 212 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Fish‐oil/omega‐3 fatty acids vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 76 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant
Summary of findings table ‐ Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 160 participantsUngraded

Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 100 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
RR 1.28 [0.02, 106.52]2 studies · 122 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin versus placebo for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)‐associated pruritus

Population: patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 112 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Topical capsaicin vs placebo
RR 3.69 [1.17, 11.67]3 studies · 116 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone versus placebo for patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)

Population: patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
PruritusScale from: 0 to 10
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 52 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Naltrexone vs placebo
RR 2.67 [1.32, 5.39]1 study · 40 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin versus placebo for patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)

Population: patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 42 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin vs placebo
RR 0.29 [0.03, 2.51]1 study · 39 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol versus placebo for patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)

Population: patients with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
CD008320.PUB4 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus: significant improvement
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
RR 2.32 [0.54, 10.1]2 studies · 69 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Pruritus
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Paroxetine versus placebo for pruritus

Population: palliative care patients with pruritus
CD008320.PUB3 · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Paroxetine vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Paroxetine vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction
Paroxetine vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Depression ‐ not measured
Paroxetine vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Nausea
Paroxetine vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Vomiting
Paroxetine vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Sleepiness
Paroxetine vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Naltrexone versus placebo for pruritus

Population: participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
CD008320.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 52 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Naltrexone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant
Naltrexone vs placebo
RR 4.07 [2.07, 8]3 studies · 116 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Nalfurafine versus placebo for pruritus

Population: participants with uraemic pruritus (UP)
CD008320.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Nalfurafine vs placebo
no estimate extracted3 studies · 422 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Nalfurafine vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Nalfurafine vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Nalfurafine vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) per participant
Nalfurafine vs placebo
RR 1.62 [1.15, 2.29]3 studies · 422 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Ondansetron versus placebo for pruritus

Population: patients with uraemic pruritus (UP)
CD008320.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 151 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Ondansetron vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient
Ondansetron vs placebo
RR 7.53 [0.97, 58.51]2 studies · 155 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Gabapentin versus placebo for pruritus

Population: patients with uraemic pruritus (UP)
CD008320.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Gabapentin vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 118 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Gabapentin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Gabapentin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not reported
Gabapentin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant
Gabapentin vs placebo
RR 2.63 [0.76, 9.05]1 study · 15 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Rifampicin versus placebo for pruritus

Population: participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
CD008320.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 42 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Rifampicin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant
Rifampicin vs placebo
RR 0.29 [0.03, 2.51]1 study · 39 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Flumecinol versus placebo for pruritus

Population: participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
CD008320.PUB3 · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus: significant improvement
Flumecinol vs placebo
RR 1.89 [1.05, 3.39]2 studies · 69 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Pruritus
Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life
Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant ‐ not reported
Flumecinol vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 69 participantsUngraded

Cromolyn sodium versus placebo for pruritus

Population: participants with uraemic pruritus (UP)
CD008320.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 100 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant
Cromolyn sodium vs placebo
RR 1.12 [0.4, 3.08]2 studies · 122 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Topical capsaicin versus vehicle for pruritus

Population: participants with uraemic pruritus (UP)
CD008320.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Topical capsaicin vs vehicle
no estimate extracted2 studies · 112 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Topical capsaicin vs vehicle
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Topical capsaicin vs vehicle
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Topical capsaicin vs vehicle
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant
Topical capsaicin vs vehicle
RR 4.64 [2.05, 10.51]3 studies · 116 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Zinc sulphate versus placebo for pruritus

Population: patients with uraemic pruritus (UP)
CD008320.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pruritus
Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 76 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not measured
Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured
Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression ‐ not measured
Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant
Zinc sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 160 participantsUngraded

Comparison

Population: participants with CKD‐associated or cholestatic pruritus
CD008320.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Naltrexone versus placebo (pruritus in participants with CKDP/UP and CP)*
no estimate extractedNRModerate
Naltrexone versus placebo (pruritus in participants with CKDP/UP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate
Naltrexone versus placebo (pruritus in participants with CP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate

Comparison

Population: participants with CKD‐associated pruritus
CD008320.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Nalfurafine versus placebo (pruritus in participants with CKDP/UP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate

Comparison

Population: participants with CKD‐associated or cholestatic pruritus
CD008320.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Ondansetron versus placebo (pruritus in participants with CKDP/UP and CP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate
Ondansetron versus placebo (pruritus in participants with CKDP/UP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate
Ondansetron versus cyproheptadine (pruritus in participants with CKDP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate
Ondansetron versus placebo (pruritus in participants with CP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate

Comparison

Population: participants with CKD‐associated pruritus
CD008320.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gabapenten versus placebo (pruritus in participants with CKDP/UP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate

Comparison

Population: participants with cholestatic pruritus
CD008320.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Rifampin/rifampicin versus placebo (pruritus in participants with CKDP/UP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate

Comparison

Population: participants with CKD‐associated pruritus
CD008320.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Capsaicin versus placebo (pruritus in Participnats with CKDP/UP)
no estimate extractedNRModerate

Comparison

Population: palliative care patients with advanced diseases
CD008320.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Paroxetine versus placebo (patient satisfaction in palliative care patients)
no estimate extractedNRModerate