Cochrane · systematic review · CD003216

Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers

Langer, G, Wan, CS, Fink, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

WoundsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
41
current version
GRADE rated
16
No studies
25
Included studies
NR
No studies 25 · 61%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 8 · 19.5%Low 6 · 14.6%Moderate 2 · 4.9%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients compared to standard diet for the prevention of pressure ulcers

Population: inpatients who are mildly or seriously malnourished or at risk of being malnourished, elderly patients at risk of developing pressure ulcers
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Incidence of pressure ulcers
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
RR 0.92 [0.71, 1.19]3 studies · 1634 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Time to pressure ulcer development ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Side effects ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Costs ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table ‐ Protein compared to standard diet for the prevention of pressure ulcers

Population: patients (> 65 years) following hip fracture; patients with a recent stroke
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Incidence of pressure ulcers
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein vs standard diet
RR 0.75 [0.49, 1.14]4 studies · 4264 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to pressure ulcer development ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Side effects: at least one adverse gastrointestinal event
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein vs standard diet
RR 0.7 [0.06, 7.96]2 studies · 140 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Costs ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients compared to standard diet for treating pressure ulcers

Population: long‐term care patients; inpatients without dehydration with energy intake by tube feeding; patients with pressure ulcers
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pressure ulcers healed
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
RR 1.45 [1.14, 1.85]3 studies · 577 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Time to complete healing of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in area/depth/volume of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Side effects: at least one adverse gastrointestinal event
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
RR 1.6 [0.59, 4.33]1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Costs ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants compared to standard diet or placebo for treating pressure ulcers

Population: residents of long‐term care (≥ 65 years) with pressure ulcers; inpatients with pressure ulcers
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pressure ulcers healed
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants vs standard diet or placebo
RR 1.25 [0.49, 3.15]2 studies · 61 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to complete healing of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Pressure ulcer area (absolute)
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 71 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Side effects: at least one adverse gastrointestinal event
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants vs standard diet or placebo
RR 1.17 [0.77, 1.79]1 study · 43 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Costs ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients compared to standard diet for treating pressure ulcers

Population: malnourished patients with pressure ulcers
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pressure ulcers healed
Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet
RR 1.67 [0.8, 3.46]1 study · 200 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Time to complete healing of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in pressure ulcer area (cm²)
Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Change in pressure ulcer area (percentage)
Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extracted2 studies · 231 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Acceptability of nutritional supplements: non‐adherence
Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet
RR 15.6 [0.94, 259]1 study · 49 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Side effects: at least one adverse gastrointestinal event
Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet
RR 1.54 [0.36, 6.64]3 studies · 282 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Costs (EUR)
Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extracted1 study · 138 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table ‐ Collagen compared to standard diet or placebo for treating pressure ulcers

Population: adult inpatients or outpatients with pressure ulcers
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pressure ulcers healed ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Collagen vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Time to complete healing of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Collagen vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in pressure ulcer area (cm²)
Summary of findings table ‐ Collagen vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 74 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Collagen vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Side effects: at least one adverse event
Summary of findings table ‐ Collagen vs standard diet or placebo
RR 2.69 [0.33, 22.3]2 studies · 154 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Costs ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Collagen vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Collagen vs standard diet or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies