Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,052 questions · 1,797 findings · 134 reviews

No studies found 10 · 0.6%GRADE not reported 1,630 · 90.7%Very low 95 · 5.3%Low 23 · 1.3%Moderate 22 · 1.2%High 17 · 0.9%

Fluoride varnish vs Placebo varnish, resin sealant, or standard care (oral hygiene instructions)

White spot lesion clinical score (mean values), subject level · Healthy adolescents and adults undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed multi-bracket appliances

In a pooled analysis of two placebo-controlled trials, fluoride varnish also reduced white spot lesion clinical scores (pooled SMD -0.44, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.24); this secondary outcome was not separately GRADE-rated.

1 finding from 1 review

Outer carious dentin (by lesion depth/location) vs Inner carious dentin

MMP-9 location/depth · Human ex vivo carious dentin

No clear direction of MMP-9 expression by lesion depth/location was found; the evidence is very uncertain (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mutans streptococci detected in plaque or saliva at baseline vs No mutans streptococci detected in plaque or saliva at baseline

Development of any (cavitated or non-cavitated) carious lesion · Children younger than 6 years with caries-free primary dentition (no cavitated or non-cavitated lesions at baseline)

Across the sample-based sensitivity analysis, mutans streptococci at baseline were associated with higher odds of developing caries.

1 finding from 1 review

Resin-based fissure sealant vs Fluoride varnish

DMFS (decayed, missing, filled surfaces) increment, occlusal surfaces · Schoolchildren aged 6-12 years with sound occlusal surfaces of the first permanent molars

Pit and fissure sealant and fluoride varnish showed no statistically significant difference in DMFS increment at 24 months (SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.40; I2=92%; not GRADE-rated).

1 finding from 1 review

Nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) dentifrice/paste (fluoride-free or fluoridated) vs nHA-free / fluoride-free (negative) control

Mineral loss (transversal microradiography) · Enamel/dentin specimens with initial caries lesions (or sound surfaces) in intraoral (in situ) appliances worn by patients

Under remineralizing conditions, nHA produced significantly more remineralization than the negative control (MD 350, 95% CI 179 to 521; very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Dental caries (carious oral microbiome) vs Caries-free / healthy oral microbiome

Alpha diversity (Chao1, Observed, Shannon) · Adults providing oral (saliva/supragingival plaque) 16S rRNA microbiome samples

In adults, caries-vs-health alpha diversity differed for the Shannon index but not Chao1/Observed (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable

Caries experience (mean DMFT) · Children aged 12 years (plus or minus one year) in Africa

The pooled mean DMFT score was 1.0900 (95% CI 0.9143 to 1.2657); GRADE was not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

Dental caries vs Caries-free status

Alpha diversity (Observed, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) · Participants in oral 16S rRNA caries microbiome studies

Across the combined sample set, alpha-diversity metrics were significantly higher in caries than in health, but no pooled effect estimate was reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Dental caries (carious oral microbiome) vs Caries-free / healthy oral microbiome

Alpha diversity (Shannon) · Children providing oral (saliva/supragingival plaque) 16S rRNA microbiome samples

In children, caries-vs-health Shannon alpha diversity differed significantly (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Dental caries (carious oral microbiome) vs Caries-free / healthy oral microbiome

Discrimination of caries vs health (random forest ROC-AUC) · Individuals providing oral (saliva/supragingival plaque) 16S rRNA microbiome samples; 2016 samples from 19 studies (mixed children and…

Microbiome-based random forest classifiers could not reliably discriminate caries from health across the combined cohort (best AUC approximately 0.75 in a disease-only KO subset; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoride-free nano-/micro-hydroxyapatite (nHA) dentifrice vs Control (regular fluoride) dentifrice

Caries lesion initiation/progression (ICDAS score, laser fluorescence/DIAGNOdent, photographic pixels, enamel acid resistance) · Patients (children and adults, age 3-40 years) with initial enamel caries lesions (non-orthodontic and orthodontic)

No meta-analysis was possible for the 5 in vivo RCTs (high heterogeneity); narratively nHA showed generally no significant difference versus fluoridated dentifrice, and the evidence was not graded (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Efficacy of nano-hydroxyapatite on caries prevention-a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2022 All outcomes
    Median follow-up 6 months (range 6-12 months) · In vivo (clinical); non-orthodontic and orthodontic patients
    No meta-analysis was performed for the in vivo studies owing to high heterogeneity (population, control group, outcomes, follow-up periods, risk of bias) and differing statistical designs (e.g., non-inferiority);…
    5 studies · 420 participants
    GRADE not reported

Dental caries vs Caries-free status

KEGG pathway associations · Participants in oral 16S rRNA caries microbiome studies

Phosphonate and phosphinate metabolism and glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism had the lowest reported adjusted P values (0.04); no pooled effect estimate was reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoride-free nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) dentifrice/paste vs Sodium fluoride (control) toothpaste

Mineral loss (transversal microradiography) · Enamel/dentin specimens with initial caries lesions (or sound surfaces) in intraoral (in situ) appliances worn by patients

Under demineralizing conditions, nHA allowed significantly more enamel demineralization than NaF (MD 1625, 95% CI 553 to 2697; very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Dental caries vs Caries-free status

Beta diversity and community composition · Participants in oral 16S rRNA caries microbiome studies

Beta-diversity matrices showed statistically significant ADONIS results, while clustering by study and 16S region was also observed; no pooled effect estimate was reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Resin-based fissure sealant vs Fluoride varnish

Caries incidence of first permanent molars (FPMs) · Schoolchildren aged 6-12 years with sound occlusal surfaces of the first permanent molars

Pit and fissure sealant and fluoride varnish showed no statistically significant difference in caries incidence of first permanent molars at 24 months (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.38; I2=89%; not GRADE-rated).

1 finding from 1 review

Study-specific random forest classifier vs Caries versus healthy disease-state labels

Study-specific disease-state discrimination · Oral microbiome samples in 15 case-controlled studies

Bong-Soo 2017, Zhu 2018, and Jiang 2019 had mean AUC scores over 0.75; exact study-specific AUCs were not reported in text or readable figure labels.

1 finding from 1 review