Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

131 questions · 132 findings · 20 reviews · Hepato-Biliary

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 7 · 5.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 106 · 80.3%Low 15 · 11.4%Moderate 4 · 3%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

Bupivacaine versus lignocaine · people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

1 finding from 1 review

Methods of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 206 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Aerosol versus liquid · people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

1 finding from 1 review

Methods of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Patient education vs no education

Knowledge · patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Formal education of patients about to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 338 participants
Very low

Patient education vs no education

Patient satisfaction · patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Formal education of patients about to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 305 participants
Very low

Patient education vs no education

Anxiety · patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Formal education of patients about to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 76 participants
Very low

Patient education with repeat‐back vs patient education without repeat‐back

Knowledge · patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Formal education of patients about to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 173 participants
Very low

Supplementary box model training vs standard training

All‐cause mortality · surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 168 participants
Very low

Supplementary box model training vs standard training

Morbidity · surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 168 participants
Very low

Supplementary box model training vs standard training

Operating time · surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 50 participants
Low

Supplementary box model training vs standard training

Proportion with day surgery · surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 50 participants
Low

Supplementary box model training vs standard training

Operating performance · surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 249 participants
Very low

Box model training vs no training or standard surgical training

Procedural score Time to completion of task · trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience.

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 229 participants
Very low

Box model training vs no training or standard surgical training

Error score · trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience.

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 69 participants
Very low

Box model training vs no training or standard surgical training

Accuracy score · trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience.

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 73 participants
Very low

Box model training vs no training or standard surgical training

Composite score · trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience.

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 321 participants
Very low

Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy

All‐cause mortality · people with acute cholecystitis.

1 finding from 1 review

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 438 participants
Very low

Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Bile duct injury · people with acute cholecystitis.

It is very uncertain whether early changes bile duct injury compared with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Peto OR 0.49 [0.05, 4.72]
5 studies · 438 participants
Very low

Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Other serious complications · people with acute cholecystitis.

It is very uncertain whether early changes other serious complications compared with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.29 [0.61, 2.72]
5 studies · 438 participants
Very low

Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Conversion to open cholecystectomy · people with acute cholecystitis.

It is very uncertain whether early changes conversion to open cholecystectomy compared with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.89 [0.63, 1.25]
6 studies · 488 participants
Very low

Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Length of hospital stay · people with acute cholecystitis.

1 finding from 1 review

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 373 participants
Moderate