Cochrane · systematic review · CD009933
Formal education of patients about to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Gurusamy, KS, Vaughan, J, Davidson, BR · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Patient education compared with no patient education for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Population: patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Patient knowledge Patient education vs no patient education | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 338 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Patient satisfaction Patient education vs no patient education | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 305 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Patient anxiety Patient education vs no patient education | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 76 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Patient education with repeat‐back compared with patient education without repeat‐back for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Population: patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Patient knowledge Patient education with repeat‐back vs patient education without repeat‐back | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 173 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |