Cochrane · systematic review · CD010479
Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience
Nagendran, M, Toon, CD, Davidson, BR, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Box model training compared with no training or standard surgical training for trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience
Population: trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Time taken for task completion (seconds) Box model training vs no training or standard surgical training | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 229 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Error score Box model training vs no training or standard surgical training | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 69 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Accuracy score Box model training vs no training or standard surgical training | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 73 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Composite score Box model training vs no training or standard surgical training | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 321 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |