Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant
Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · adults with refractory glaucoma
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 54 participantsVery low
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
334 questions · 337 findings · 56 reviews
No studies found 77 · 22.8%GRADE not reported 5 · 1.5%Very low 113 · 33.5%Low 75 · 22.3%Moderate 61 · 18.1%High 6 · 1.8%
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant
Mean change in the mean deviation in study eyes change from baseline 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant
Mean number of antiglaucoma medications at 1‐year · adults with refractory glaucoma
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 54 participantsVery low
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant
Adverse events 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 68 participantsVery low
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant
Mean change in quality of life scores 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Surgical debridement via an endoscopic method vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement
Time to a clean wound bed ( · adults with surgical wounds
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 106 participantsVery low
Surgical debridement via an endoscopic method vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement
Proportion of wounds completely debrided · adults with surgical wounds
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Surgical debridement via an endoscopic method vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement
Rate of reduction in wound size · adults with surgical wounds
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Surgical debridement via an endoscopic method vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement
Proportion of wounds healed · adults with surgical wounds
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Surgical debridement via an endoscopic method vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement
Time to complete healing · adults with surgical wounds
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 106 participantsLow
Surgical debridement via an endoscopic method vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement
Serious adverse events: life‐threatening/ hospitalisation · adults with surgical wounds
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Virtual reality endoscopic sinus surgery training vs conventional training
Psychomotor score Performance rating scale Scale from: 0 to 10 · surgical trainees
1 finding from 1 review
- Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted2 studies · 29 participantsVery low
Virtual reality endoscopic sinus surgery training vs conventional training
Procedural score Time to completion of task · surgical trainees
1 finding from 1 review
- Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 25 participantsLow
Virtual reality endoscopic sinus surgery training vs conventional training
Anatomy score Anatomy identification test Scale from: 0 to 10 · medical students
1 finding from 1 review
- Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsVery low
Leukotriene receptor antagonist vs placebo
Endoscopic improvement (dichotomous) · inactive EoE patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Leukotriene receptor antagonist vs placebo
Endoscopic improvement (continuous) · inactive EoE patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg
Endoscopic improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg
Endoscopic improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg
Endoscopic improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg
Endoscopic improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found