Question · asked by 1 review
Virtual reality endoscopic sinus surgery training vs conventional training: Anatomy score Anatomy identification test Scale from: 0 to 10
- Population
- medical students
- Intervention
- Virtual reality endoscopic sinus surgery training
- Comparison
- conventional training
- Outcome
- Anatomy score Anatomy identification test Scale from: 0 to 10
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Virtual reality endoscopic sinus surgery training vs conventional training Anatomy score Anatomy identification test Scale from: 0 to 10 · medical students Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 17 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.