Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,395 questions in 172 reviews · Gut

current versions
No studies 420 · 17.5%Ungraded 60 · 2.5%Very low 821 · 34.3%Low 602 · 25.1%Moderate 397 · 16.6%High 95 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
PPI triple therapy for 14 days vs 10 days
Patients with adverse events, regardless of regimen and dose · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.79, 1.29]5 studies · 789 participantsLow
PPI triple therapy for 14 days vs 7 days
H. pylori persistence, PCA subgroup · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.57, 0.75]34 studies · 5801 participantsModerate
PPI triple therapy for 14 days vs 7 days
H. pylori persistence, PCN subgroup · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.71, 1.07]4 studies · 688 participantsLow
PPI triple therapy for 14 days vs 7 days
H. pylori persistence, PAN subgroup · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.52, 0.86]10 studies · 1066 participantsModerate
PPI triple therapy for 14 days vs 7 days
H. pylori persistence, PAQ subgroup · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.37 [0.16, 0.83]2 studies · 167 participantsLow
PPI triple therapy for 14 days vs 7 days
Patients with adverse events, regardless of regimen and dose · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane
RR 1.2 [1.06, 1.37]25 studies · 3971 participantsModerate
PPI triple therapy for 10 days vs 7 days
H. pylori persistence, regardless of regimen and dose · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.72, 0.89]24 studies · 4628 participantsModerate
PPI triple therapy for 10 days vs 7 days
H. pylori persistence, PCA subgroup · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.7, 0.91]17 studies · 3271 participantsModerate
PPI triple therapy for 10 days vs 7 days
H. pylori persistence, PCN subgroup · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.55, 1.79]2 studies · 148 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Perioperative mortality · people with pancreatic surgery
Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.56, 1.16]18 studies · 2210 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Treatment withdrawal · people with pancreatic surgery
Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery (2013) · Cochrane
RR 1.55 [0.56, 4.33]9 studies · 1220 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Re‐operation · people with pancreatic surgery
Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery (2013) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.69, 1.63]7 studies · 687 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Anastomotic leak · people with pancreatic surgery
Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.51, 1.27]9 studies · 1585 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Pancreatic fistula (clinically significant) · people with pancreatic surgery
Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.38, 1.29]4 studies · 292 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Infected abdominal collections · people with pancreatic surgery
Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.66, 1.32]13 studies · 1965 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Shock · people with pancreatic surgery
Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery (2013) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.46, 2.15]4 studies · 812 participantsUngraded
Post‐surgical chemotherapy vs surgery alone
Overall Survival (OS) · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.85 [0.8, 0.9]34 studies · 7523 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Lymph node mets analysis ‐ N+ OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.78 [0.67, 0.91]4 studies · 877 participantsModerate
Post‐surgical chemotherapy vs surgery alone
Disease Free Survival · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.79 [0.72, 0.87]15 studies · 4133 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Chemobased OS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.88 [0.83, 0.94]28 studies · 5694 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Chemobased OS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.9 [0.81, 1]9 studies · 1504 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Chemobased DFS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy DFS · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.86 [0.78, 0.95]13 studies · 2944 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Chemobased DFS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy DFS · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.89 [0.75, 1.06]4 studies · 969 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Stage OS analysis ‐ T1/2 OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.86 [0.71, 1.05]5 studies · 1146 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Stage OS analysis ‐ T3/4 OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.66 [0.41, 1.08]4 studies · 1008 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Lymph node mets analysis ‐ N‐ OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer (2013) · Cochrane
HR 0.74 [0.41, 1.33]2 studies · 402 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Survival · patients with unresectable periampullary carcinoma
Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary carcinoma (2013) · Cochrane
HR 1.02 [0.84, 1.25]2 studies · 152 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Gastric outlet obstruction Clinical symptoms of vomiting with confirmation of the gastric outlet obstruction by radiological or endoscopic investigations · patients with unresectable periampullary carcinoma
Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary carcinoma (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.1 [0.03, 0.37]2 studies · 152 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Operating time · patients with unresectable periampullary carcinoma
Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary carcinoma (2013) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 87 participantsVery low
Morphine vs metamizole
Improvements in pain intensity as defined by the trialist (primary outcome) · participants with acute pancreatitis pain
Opioids for acute pancreatitis pain (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.19, 1.33]1 study · 16 participantsLow
Opioids vs no opioids
Supplementary analgesic option offered (primary outcome 2) · participants with acute pancreatitis pain
Opioids for acute pancreatitis pain (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.41 [0.29, 0.57]3 studies · 162 participantsLow
Opioids vs no opioids
Pancreatitis complications (secondary outcome 1) · participants with acute pancreatitis pain
Opioids for acute pancreatitis pain (2013) · Cochrane
RR 1.05 [0.82, 1.34]3 studies · 162 participantsLow
Opioids vs no opioids
Any drug‐related adverse event (secondary outcome 2) · participants with acute pancreatitis pain
Opioids for acute pancreatitis pain (2013) · Cochrane
RR 2 [0.9, 4.46]2 studies · 110 participantsLow
Opioids vs no opioids
Nausea and vomiting (secondary outcome 2) · participants with acute pancreatitis pain
Opioids for acute pancreatitis pain (2013) · Cochrane
RR 1.68 [0.7, 4]2 studies · 55 participantsLow
Opioids vs no opioids
Sedation and somnolence (secondary outcome 2) · participants with acute pancreatitis pain
Opioids for acute pancreatitis pain (2013) · Cochrane
RR 5.54 [0.69, 44.79]2 studies · 55 participantsLow
Opioids vs no opioids
Death from any cause (secondary outcome 3) · participants with acute pancreatitis pain
Opioids for acute pancreatitis pain (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.35 [0.02, 8.1]4 studies · 194 participantsVery low
Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Serious adverse events · people with mild acute gallstone pancreatitis
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.81]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Hospital stay · people with mild acute gallstone pancreatitis
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis (2013) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 49 participantsLow
Rectal 5‐ASA vs placebo
Symptomatic remission · patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Rectal 5‐aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2012) · Cochrane
RR 2.22 [1.26, 3.9]4 studies · 301 participantsLow
Rectal 5‐ASA vs oral 5‐ASA
Symptomatic remission · patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Rectal 5‐aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.24 [0.92, 1.66]2 studies · 69 participantsLow
Rectal 5‐ASA vs oral 5‐ASA
Endoscopic remission · patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Rectal 5‐aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [0.9, 1.45]2 studies · 91 participantsLow
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture
symptom severity (continuous outcome) IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS‐SSS) · patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Acupuncture for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 281 participantsModerate
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture
quality of life (continuous outcome) IBS Quality of Life (IBS‐QOL) Scale6. Scale from: 0 to 100. · patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Acupuncture for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 253 participantsModerate
Acupuncture vs pharmaceutical medications
symptom severity (dichotomous outcome) Dichotomous measure of overall symptom severity1 · patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Acupuncture for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.28 [1.12, 1.45]5 studies · 449 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Oesophageal cancer‐specific mortality ‐ not measured · patients with oesophageal cancer
Screening for oesophageal cancer (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Secondary outcomes ‐ not measured · patients with oesophageal cancer
Screening for oesophageal cancer (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Curcumin vs placebo
Relapse at 6 months Clinical Disease Activty Index more than 42 · Maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis
Curcumin for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.24 [0.05, 1.09]1 study · 89 participantsLow
Curcumin vs placebo
Relapse at 12 months Clinical Disease Activty Index more than 42 · Maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis
Curcumin for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.35, 1.4]1 study · 89 participantsLow
Curcumin vs placebo
Clinical Activity Index at 6 months Clinical Disease Activty Index 2. Scale from: 0 to 12. · Maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis
Curcumin for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 82 participantsLow
Curcumin vs placebo
Endoscopic Index at 6 months Endoscopic Index9. Scale from: 1 to 4. · Maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis
Curcumin for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 82 participantsLow