Cochrane · systematic review · CD010326
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis
Gurusamy, KS, Nagendran, M, Davidson, BR · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
GutAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
2
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild acute pancreatitis
Population: people with mild acute gallstone pancreatitis
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious adverse events Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy | RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.81] | 1 study · 50 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Hospital stay Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 49 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |