What do systematic reviews say?

Outreach clinic vs house‐to‐house screening

• Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Tuberculosis outreach screening vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether tuberculosis outreach screening changes long‐term tuberculosis prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.14 [0.65, 2]
  556836 participants
  Very low

Individual TF‐CBT vs Brief PTSD psychoeducation

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 49 participants
  Low

Digital intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

• Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  41 studies · 19241 participants
  Moderate

Digital intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

• Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  15 studies · 10862 participants
  Moderate

Digital intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

• Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  15 studies · 3587 participants
  Moderate

Digital intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

• Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  15 studies · 9791 participants
  Moderate

Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention

• Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 390 participants
  Low

Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention

• Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 58 participants
  Low

Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention

• Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 206 participants
  Low

Return to work coordination programmes vs usual practice

Return to work coordination programmes showed no clear difference in proportion who had ever returned to work ‐ long‐term compared with usual practice (moderate certainty).

• Return‐to‐work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.03 [0.97, 1.09]
  8 studies · 3822 participants
  Moderate

Return to work coordination programmes vs usual practice

Return to work coordination programmes showed no clear difference in proportion who had ever returned to work ‐ very long‐term compared with usual practice (low certainty).

• Return‐to‐work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.95 [0.88, 1.02]
  3 studies · 938 participants
  Low

Return to work coordination programmes vs usual practice

Return to work coordination programmes showed no clear difference in time to return to work ‐ long‐term compared with usual practice (low certainty).

• Return‐to‐work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 1.25 [0.95, 1.66]
  6 studies · 1935 participants
  Low

Return to work coordination programmes vs usual practice

Return to work coordination programmes showed no clear difference in time to return to work ‐ very long‐term compared with usual practice (low certainty).

• Return‐to‐work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.93 [0.74, 1.17]
  2 studies · 474 participants
  Low

Return to work coordination programmes vs usual practice

• Return‐to‐work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 1339 participants
  Low

Return to work coordination programmes vs usual practice

• Return‐to‐work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 8052 participants
  Moderate

Erythrocytapheresis vs phlebotomy

• Interventions for hereditary haemochromatosis 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 participants
  GRADE not reported

Back School vs medical care

It is very uncertain whether back School changes pain: long‐term compared with medical care (very low certainty).

• Back Schools for chronic non‐specific low back pain 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 406 participants
  Very low

Back School vs medical care

It is very uncertain whether back School changes disability: long‐term compared with medical care (very low certainty).

• Back Schools for chronic non‐specific low back pain 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 201 participants
  Very low

Back School vs passive physiotherapy

It is very uncertain whether back School changes pain ‐ long‐term compared with passive physiotherapy (very low certainty).

• Back Schools for chronic non‐specific low back pain 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 291 participants
  Very low