Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,395 questions in 172 reviews · Gut

current versions
No studies 420 · 17.5%Ungraded 60 · 2.5%Very low 821 · 34.3%Low 602 · 25.1%Moderate 397 · 16.6%High 95 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Anastomotic leakage Radiographic contrast study and/or clinical manifestation · patients with oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.25 [0.11, 0.55]3 studies · 633 participantsModerate
Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Anastomotic leakage—TTE Radiographic contrast study · patients with oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.19 [0.03, 1.03]2 studies · 272 participantsModerate
Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Anastomotic leakage—THE Radiographic contrast study · patients with oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.23 [0.07, 0.79]2 studies · 177 participantsModerate
Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Anastomotic leakage—3‐field oesophagectomy Radiographic contrast study and/or clinical manifestation · patients with oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.09, 1.19]1 study · 184 participantsModerate
Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Anastomotic strictures Barium swallow and/ or endoscope examinationd · patients with oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.33, 2.57]3 studies · 631 participantsModerate
Balloon sensory training biofeedback vs surgery
Number improved at one year · Patients with anismus and chronic constipation
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.43 [0.21, 0.89]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Balloon sensory training biofeedback vs surgery
Constipation score at one year · Patients with anismus and chronic constipation
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Balloon sensory training biofeedback vs botulinum toxin‐A
Constipation score at one year · Patients with anismus and chronic constipation
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsVery low
EMG biofeedback vs diazepam
Number improved at three months · Patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia and chronic constipation
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RR 3 [1.51, 5.98]1 study · 60 participantsVery low
EMG biofeedback vs STARR procedure
Treatment success at one year1 · Patients with obstructed defecation
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.41 [0.26, 0.65]1 study · 93 participantsLow
EMG biofeedback vs STARR procedure
Obstructed defecation score at one year · Patients with obstructed defecation
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 93 participantsLow
EMG biofeedback vs laxative
Major clinical improvement at six months · Patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia and chronic constipation
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RR 3.65 [2.17, 6.13]1 study · 109 participantsLow
Manometry biofeedback vs sham biofeedback
Complete spontaneous bowel movements per week at three months · Patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia and chronic constipation
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsLow
Manometry biofeedback vs standard care
Complete spontaneous bowel movements per week at three months · Patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia and chronic constipation
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsLow
Manual acupuncture vs cisapride
Symptom scores of FD Graded by 4 levels1 · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.91, 1.16]1 study · 90 participantsVery low
Electroacupuncture vs itopride
Symptom scores of FD Graded by 4 levels1 · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.98, 1.27]1 study · 80 participantsLow
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture
FD symptom scores Graded by 4 levels1 · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 116 participantsLow
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture
FD symptom scores at · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 116 participantsLow
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture
Nepean Dyspepsia Symptom Index · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 128 participantsLow
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture
Nepean Dyspepsia Life Quality Index · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 128 participantsLow
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture
Nepean Dyspepsia Symptom Index at · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture
Nepean Dyspepsia Life Quality Index at · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture
SF‐36 SF‐36 scale · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 116 participantsLow
Manual acupuncture vs cisapride
Adverse effects Discomfort after treatment · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.21 [0.07, 0.69]1 study · 90 participantsVery low
Manual acupuncture vs cisapride
Frequency of FD symptoms Number of FD attacks per week · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.75, 1.4]1 study · 90 participantsVery low
Manual acupuncture vs domperidone
Symptom scores of FD Graded by 4 levels1 · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.24 [0.97, 1.58]1 study · 62 participantsLow
Manual‐electroacupuncture vs domperidone
Symptom scores of FD Graded by 4 levels1 · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [1, 1.3]1 study · 126 participantsVery low
Manual‐electroacupuncture vs domperidone
Symptom scores of ulceration subtype Graded by 4 levels1 · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.26, 2.51]1 study · 126 participantsVery low
Manual‐electroacupuncture vs domperidone
Symptom scores of regurgitation subtype Graded by 4 levels1 · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.42, 1.86]1 study · 126 participantsVery low
Manual‐electroacupuncture vs domperidone
Symptom scores of dyskinesia subtype Graded by 4 levels1 · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.2 [0.76, 1.89]1 study · 126 participantsVery low
Manual‐electroacupuncture vs domperidone
Symptom scores of nonspecific subtype Graded by 4 levels1 · patients with functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture for functional dyspepsia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.45 [0.77, 2.76]1 study · 126 participantsVery low
Antioxidant vs control intervention
Pain visual analogue score Scale from 0 to 10 · patients with pain in chronic pancreatitis
Antioxidants for pain in chronic pancreatitis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 129 participantsModerate
Antioxidant vs control intervention
Pain‐free participants · patients with pain in chronic pancreatitis
Antioxidants for pain in chronic pancreatitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.73 [0.95, 3.15]3 studies · 264 participantsLow
Antioxidant vs control intervention
Adverse effects—parallel trials · patients with pain in chronic pancreatitis
Antioxidants for pain in chronic pancreatitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 4.43 [1.6, 12.29]3 studies · 212 participantsModerate
Antioxidant vs control intervention
Adverse effects—cross‐over trials (unpaired data) · patients with pain in chronic pancreatitis
Antioxidants for pain in chronic pancreatitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 5.8 [1.56, 21.53]5 studies · 192 participantsModerate
Trichuris suis eggs vs placebo
Clinical remission · induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Helminth therapy (worms) for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 2.4 [0.27, 21.63]1 study · 54 participantsLow
Trichuris suis eggs vs placebo
Clinical improvement at 12 weeks · induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Helminth therapy (worms) for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 2.6 [0.97, 6.95]1 study · 54 participantsLow
Pancreatic resection vs palliative treatment
Overall mortality · patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Resection versus other treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (2014) · Cochrane
HR 0.38 [0.25, 0.58]2 studies · 98 participantsVery low
Pancreatic resection vs palliative treatment
Length of hospital stay · patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Resection versus other treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Pancreatic resection vs palliative treatment
Costs · patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Resection versus other treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Proton pump inhibitor vs control
Number of participants with worsening scores in corporal atrophy · people with pre‐malignant lesions
Long‐term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the development of gastric pre‐malignant lesions (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.5 [0.59, 3.8]4 studies · 1070 participantsLow
Proton pump inhibitor vs control
Number of participants with worsening scores in corporal intestinal metaplasia · people with pre‐malignant lesions
Long‐term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the development of gastric pre‐malignant lesions (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.46 [0.43, 5.03]5 studies · 1408 participantsLow
Proton pump inhibitor vs control
Increase in the number of participants with simple (diffuse) hyperplasia after treatment · people with pre‐malignant lesions
Long‐term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the development of gastric pre‐malignant lesions (2014) · Cochrane
OR 5.01 [1.54, 16.26]6 studies · 1705 participantsVery low
Proton pump inhibitor vs control
Increase in the number of participants with linear/micronodular (focal) hyperplasia, comparing final biopsies with baseline biopsies · people with pre‐malignant lesions
Long‐term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the development of gastric pre‐malignant lesions (2014) · Cochrane
OR 3.98 [1.31, 12.16]6 studies · 1705 participantsLow
Intervention NR
PPI versus placebo Symptomatic outcome measures · patients with heartburn remission in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease‐like symptoms
Short‐term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2‐receptor antagonists and prokinetics for… (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.37 [0.32, 0.44]2 studies · 760 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
H2RA versus placebo · patients with heartburn remission in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease‐like symptoms
Short‐term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2‐receptor antagonists and prokinetics for… (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.6, 0.99]2 studies · 1013 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Prokinetic versus placebo · patients with heartburn remission in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease‐like symptoms
Short‐term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2‐receptor antagonists and prokinetics for… (2013) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 322 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
PPI versus H2RA · patients with heartburn remission in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease‐like symptoms
Short‐term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2‐receptor antagonists and prokinetics for… (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.66 [0.6, 0.73]7 studies · 3147 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
PPI versus prokinetic · patients with heartburn remission in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease‐like symptoms
Short‐term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2‐receptor antagonists and prokinetics for… (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.32, 0.87]2 studies · 747 participantsLow
Intervention NR
PPI versus placebo · patients with heartburn remission in endoscopy negative reflux disease
Short‐term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2‐receptor antagonists and prokinetics for… (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.71 [0.65, 0.78]10 studies · 3710 participantsModerate