Treatment failure within 72 hours of trial entry · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support
Nasal high flow probably leads to higher treatment failure within 72 hours of trial entry compared with continuous positive airway pressure (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support
Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry compared with continuous positive airway pressure (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumothorax · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support
Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in pneumothorax (during assigned treatment) compared with continuous positive airway pressure (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Nasal trauma (during assigned treatment) · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support
Nasal high flow probably leads to lower nasal trauma (during assigned treatment) compared with continuous positive airway pressure (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Death (before hospital discharge) or BPD (supplemental oxygen/respiratory support at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age if born < 32 weeks' gestation, or 28 days if born ≥ 32 weeks' gestation) · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support
It is very uncertain whether nasal high flow changes death (before hospital discharge) or BPD (supplemental… compared with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mortality before hospital discharge · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support
Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in death (before hospital discharge) compared with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Gastrointestinal intolerance · promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants
1 finding from 1 review
NEC · promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants
1 finding from 1 review
Neurodevelopmental outcomes · promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Long‐term growth outcomes · promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Necrotising enterocolitis · formula‐fed low birth weight infants
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Weight gain · formula‐fed low birth weight infants
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Linear growth (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Growth: head circumference (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
IQ score and Bayley score at 18 months or later · formula‐fed low birth weight infants
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Underweight · healthy, full‐term (37 to 42 weeks), formula‐fed infants
1 finding from 1 review
Stunting · healthy, full‐term (37 to 42 weeks), formula‐fed infants
1 finding from 1 review
Wasting · healthy, full‐term (37 to 42 weeks), formula‐fed infants
1 finding from 1 review
Overweight · healthy, full‐term (37 to 42 weeks), formula‐fed infants
It is very uncertain whether high‐protein formula changes overweight compared with standard‐protein formula (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Obesity · healthy, full‐term (37 to 42 weeks), formula‐fed infants
It is very uncertain whether high‐protein formula changes obesity compared with standard‐protein formula (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review