Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,589 questions in 168 reviews · Schizophrenia

current versions
No studies 601 · 23.2%Ungraded 446 · 17.2%Very low 721 · 27.8%Low 505 · 19.5%Moderate 274 · 10.6%High 42 · 1.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
SOCIAL SKILLS vs DISCUSSION CONTROL
Global state GAS · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 63 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs DISCUSSION CONTROL
Mental state: general symptoms · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 99 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs DISCUSSION CONTROL
Quality of life QLS · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 63 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs STANDARD CARE
Relapse · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.52 [0.34, 0.79]2 studies · 263 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs STANDARD CARE
Rehospitalisation · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.3, 0.93]1 study · 143 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs STANDARD CARE
Mental state: general symptoms (BPRS) · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 91 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs STANDARD CARE
Global state: not clinically improved. CGI · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.29 [0.12, 0.68]1 study · 67 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs STANDARD CARE
General functioning MRSS · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 112 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs STANDARD CARE
Quality of life GWB. Scale from: 10 to 40. · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 112 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs DISCUSSION CONTROL
Social functioning Various scales · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 63 participantsVery low
SOCIAL SKILLS vs DISCUSSION CONTROL
Relapse · patients with schizophrenia
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 2.12 [0.44, 10.1]1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Adjunct cognitive behavioural therapy vs adjunct supportive psychotherapy
Global state: Clinically significant improvement · patients with delusional disorder
Treatments for delusional disorder (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adjunct cognitive behavioural therapy vs adjunct supportive psychotherapy
Mental state: Delusions ‐ clinically significant improvement · patients with delusional disorder
Treatments for delusional disorder (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adjunct cognitive behavioural therapy vs adjunct supportive psychotherapy
Mental state: Depression BDI · patients with delusional disorder
Treatments for delusional disorder (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsLow
Adjunct cognitive behavioural therapy vs adjunct supportive psychotherapy
Mental state: Anxiety BAI · patients with delusional disorder
Treatments for delusional disorder (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsLow
Adjunct cognitive behavioural therapy vs adjunct supportive psychotherapy
Service use: Admission · patients with delusional disorder
Treatments for delusional disorder (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adjunct cognitive behavioural therapy vs adjunct supportive psychotherapy
Social function: Self worth ‐ average score Social Self‐Esteem Inventory · patients with delusional disorder
Treatments for delusional disorder (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsVery low
Adjunct cognitive behavioural therapy vs adjunct supportive psychotherapy
Adverse event: Leaving the study early · patients with delusional disorder
Treatments for delusional disorder (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.17 [0.02, 1.18]1 study · 24 participantsModerate
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Clinically important response to treatment (short term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.87, 1]40 studies · 2132 participantsLow
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Adverse effects: number of participants with at least one adverse effect (medium term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.07 [0.58, 1.97]2 studies · 137 participantsVery low
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Adverse effects: extrapyramidal side effects: number of participants with at least one extrapyramidal side effect (medium term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.62, 1.75]1 study · 80 participantsVery low
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Leaving the study early due to any reason as a measure of overall acceptability (short term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.87, 1.24]28 studies · 1299 participantsLow
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Leaving the study early due to inefficacy of treatment as a measure of overall efficacy (short term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.4, 2.16]13 studies · 507 participantsVery low
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Leaving the study early due to adverse events as a measure of overall tolerability (short term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.42, 2.35]16 studies · 640 participantsVery low
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Adverse effects: number of participants with at least one adverse effect (short term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.94, 1.2]10 studies · 693 participantsLow
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Adverse effects: extrapyramidal side effects: number of participants with at least one extrapyramidal side effect (short term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [0.95, 1.31]17 studies · 998 participantsVery low
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Clinically important response to treatment (medium term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.37, 0.69]1 study · 80 participantsLow
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Leaving the study early due to any reason as a measure of overall acceptability (medium term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.75, 1.38]2 studies · 137 participantsVery low
Haloperidol vs first‐generation antipsychotics
Leaving the study early due to adverse events as a measure of overall tolerability (medium term) · people with schizophrenia
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsLow
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate (vitamin B6) vs Placebo
Clinical efficacy ‐ improvement (> 40%) in ESRS scores from baseline ESRS1 · patients with neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate for neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 19.97 [2.87, 139.19]2 studies · 65 participantsLow
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate (vitamin B6) vs Placebo
Global: Other adverse effects than tardive dyskinesia Self‐report by participants · patients with neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate for neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 3.97 [0.2, 78.59]2 studies · 65 participantsLow
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate (vitamin B6) vs Placebo
Global: Discontinuation of Vitamin B6 · patients with neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate for neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 8.72 [0.51, 149.75]2 studies · 65 participantsLow
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate (vitamin B6) vs Placebo
Tardive dyskinesia: Deterioration in tardive dyskinesia symptoms ESRS1 · patients with neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate for neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.16 [0.01, 3.14]2 studies · 65 participantsLow
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate (vitamin B6) vs Placebo
General mental state: Positive psychiatric symptom score PANSS5. Scale from: 7 to 49. · patients with neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate for neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsLow
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate (vitamin B6) vs Placebo
General mental state: Negative psychiatric symptoms PANSS5. Scale from: 7 to 49. · patients with neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia
Pyridoxal 5 phosphate for neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsLow
Psychoeducation vs standard care
Siblings' quality of life ‐ by 12 months (reversed FAD, high = good) Reversed FAD. Scale from: 4 to 28. · Siblings of people with severe mental illness
Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 9 participantsLow
Psychoeducation vs standard care
Siblings' coping (in terms of burden) ‐ by 12 months (FBIS, high = poor) · Siblings of people with severe mental illness
Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 9 participantsLow
Psychoeducation vs standard care
Leaving the study early for any reason ‐ by 12 months · Siblings of people with severe mental illness
Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 9 participantsLow
Psychoeducation vs standard care
Service users' general mental state ‐ by 12 months (BPRS, high = poor) · Siblings of people with severe mental illness
Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 9 participantsLow
Psychoeducation vs standard care
Service users' number of re‐hospitalisation to a psychiatric inpatient unit over six months ‐ by 12 months · Siblings of people with severe mental illness
Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 9 participantsLow
Psychoeducation vs standard care
Service users' inpatient bed occupancy in terms of average days of hospital stay over 6 months ‐ by 12 months · Siblings of people with severe mental illness
Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 9 participantsLow
Psychoeducation vs standard care
Service users' specific aspect of quality of life, i.e. social functioning ‐ by 12 months (SLOF, high = good) Scale from: 43 to 215. · Siblings of people with severe mental illness
Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 9 participantsLow
YOGA vs STANDARD CARE
Mental state: Overall ‐ not improved PANSS · people with schizophrenia
Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.55, 0.88]1 study · 83 participantsModerate
YOGA vs STANDARD CARE
Social functioning: Overall ‐ not improved SOFS · people with schizophrenia
Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.77, 1]1 study · 83 participantsModerate
YOGA vs STANDARD CARE
Quality of life: Average change ‐ mental health SF‐36 · people with schizophrenia
Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
YOGA vs STANDARD CARE
Physical health: Average change SF‐36 · people with schizophrenia
Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
YOGA vs STANDARD CARE
Adverse events: any · people with schizophrenia
Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 94 participantsModerate
YOGA vs STANDARD CARE
Costs of care · people with schizophrenia
Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
YOGA vs STANDARD CARE
Leaving the study early Leaving the study early: participants lost to · people with schizophrenia
Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.6, 1.37]8 studies · 457 participantsModerate
ZUCLOPENTHIXOL DIHYDROCHLORIDE vs PLACEBO
Clinically significant response on global state ‐ as defined by each of the studies, Improvement (CGI) ‐ short term ‐ as rated by nurse Improvement (CGI) ‐ short term ‐ as rated by psychiatrist · people with with schizophrenia
Zuclopenthixol versus placebo for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane
RR 2.57 [1.06, 6.2]1 study · 29 participantsVery low