2‐hourly repositioning vs 4‐hourly repositioning
Costs · adults
2‐hourly repositioning led to higher costs compared with 4‐hourly repositioning; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 41 study · 967 participantsGRADE not reported
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
805 questions · 838 findings · 55 reviews · Wounds
No studies found 354 · 42.2%GRADE not reported 38 · 4.5%Very low 283 · 33.8%Low 132 · 15.8%Moderate 27 · 3.2%High 4 · 0.5%
2‐hourly repositioning vs 4‐hourly repositioning
Incremental costs · adults
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
30° 3‐hourly tilt vs 90° tilt
Health‐related quality of life · adults
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
30° 3‐hourly tilt vs 90° tilt
Procedural pain · adults
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Perioperative antibiotics vs placebo or no antibiotic
Economic outcomes: Cost of care · breast cancer surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Perioperative antibiotics vs placebo or no antibiotic
Wound infection · breast cancer surgery
It is very uncertain whether perioperative antibiotics changes wound infection Proportion of wound infections compared with placebo or no antibiotic (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.11 [0.01, 1.95]1 study · 44 participantsVery low
Perioperative antibiotics vs placebo or no antibiotic
Adverse reactions to the interventions · breast cancer surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Perioperative antibiotics vs placebo or no antibiotic
Time to onset of infection · breast cancer surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Perioperative antibiotics vs placebo or no antibiotic
Hospital readmission · breast cancer surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Bathing of the critically ill with chlorhexidine vs bathing with soap and water or non‐antimicrobial washcloths
Hospital‐acquired infections Data collected during ICU stay · critically ill patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Chlorhexidine bathing of the critically ill for the prevention of hospital‐acquired infection 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted8 studies · 21924 participantsVery low
Bathing of the critically ill with chlorhexidine vs bathing with soap and water or non‐antimicrobial washcloths
Mortality (ICU, hospital) (days) · critically ill patients
It is very uncertain whether bathing of the critically ill with chlorhexidine changes mortality Data collected (where reported) in hospital, in the ICU,… compared with bathing with soap and water or non‐antimicrobial washcloths (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Chlorhexidine bathing of the critically ill for the prevention of hospital‐acquired infection 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 0.87 [0.76, 0.99]6 studies · 15798 participantsVery low
Bathing of the critically ill with chlorhexidine vs bathing with soap and water or non‐antimicrobial washcloths
Duration of ICU stay · critically ill patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Chlorhexidine bathing of the critically ill for the prevention of hospital‐acquired infection 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted6 studies · 18570 participantsVery low
Bathing of the critically ill with chlorhexidine vs bathing with soap and water or non‐antimicrobial washcloths
Adverse effects: skin reactions. Reported as attributable to chlorhexidine or soap and water. Data collected during ICU stay · critically ill patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Chlorhexidine bathing of the critically ill for the prevention of hospital‐acquired infection 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted5 studies · 6365 participantsVery low
Intervention not reported
Ulcers completely healed · varied
The intervention showed no clear difference in ulcers completely healed (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.57 [0.26, 1.27]1 study · 30 participantsLow
Intervention not reported
Ulcers completely healed · varied
The intervention showed no clear difference in ulcers completely healed (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.99 [0.9, 1.09]1 study · 141 participantsLow
NPWT vs dressings
Proportion of wounds healed · treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus
NPWT may leads to higher proportion of wounds healed compared with dressings (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.44 [1.03, 2.01]1 study · 162 participantsLow
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.4 [1.14, 1.72]5 studies · 486 participantsLow
NPWT vs dressings
Amputation · treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus
NPWT may leads to lower amputations compared with dressings (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.33 [0.15, 0.7]3 studies · 441 participantsLow
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.38 [0.14, 1.02]2 studies · 292 participantsVery low
NPWT vs dressings
Number of wounds closed or covered with surgery · treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus
NPWT showed no clear difference in number of wounds closed or covered with surgery compared with dressings (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.02 [0.85, 1.24]3 studies · 129 participantsLow
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.02 [0.95, 1.09]1 study · 130 participantsVery low
NPWT vs dressings
Adverse events · treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
2 findings from 1 review
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.96 [0.72, 1.28]1 study · 162 participantsVery low
NPWT vs dressings
Cost‐effectiveness · treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
2 findings from 1 review
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found