Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,558 questions in 115 reviews · Vascular

current versions
No studies 346 · 22.2%Ungraded 90 · 5.8%Very low 281 · 18%Low 477 · 30.6%Moderate 313 · 20.1%High 51 · 3.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
OUTBACK re‐entry catheter vs manual re‐entry
months' primary patency rate · 52 people with TASC‐II D superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsUngraded
OUTBACK re‐entry catheter vs manual re‐entry
Limb salvage · 52 people with TASC‐II D superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsUngraded
OUTBACK re‐entry catheter vs manual re‐entry
Complications · 52 people with TASC‐II D superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsLow
Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy
Clinical improvement: ABI improvement Significant postexercise ABI improvement · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.68, 1.08]1 study · 95 participantsLow
Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy
Technical success rate · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.88, 1.07]1 study · 95 participantsLow
Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy
months' patency rate · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.57, 1]1 study · 95 participantsLow
Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy
months' patency rate · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.74 [0.55, 1]1 study · 95 participantsLow
Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy
months' patency rate · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.52, 1.11]1 study · 95 participantsLow
Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy
months' limb salvage rate · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.9, 1.05]1 study · 95 participantsLow
Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy
Complications · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.14, 4.42]1 study · 95 participantsLow
OUTBACK re‐entry catheter vs manual re‐entry
Clinical improvement · 52 people with TASC‐II D superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusions
Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsUngraded
Endovenous laser ablation vs conventional surgery
Recanalisation or persistence of reflux at 6 weeks · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.07 [0.02, 0.22]3 studies · 289 participantsModerate
Ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy vs conventional surgery
Clinical evidence of recurrence after 1 year · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy vs conventional surgery
Reintervention (due to technical failure) · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy vs conventional surgery
Disease‐specific QoL (AVVQ) at 6 weeks · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 33 participantsUngraded
Ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy vs conventional surgery
Disease‐specific QoL (AVVQ) at 1 year · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy vs conventional surgery
Complications at 1 year · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Endovenous laser ablation vs conventional surgery
Recurrence of reflux at 1 year · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.24 [0.07, 0.77]2 studies · 119 participantsLow
Endovenous laser ablation vs conventional surgery
Clinical evidence of recurrence after 1 year · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.54 [0.17, 1.75]1 study · 99 participantsLow
Endovenous laser ablation vs conventional surgery
Reintervention (due to technical failure) · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 99 participantsModerate
Endovenous laser ablation vs conventional surgery
Disease‐specific QoL (AVVQ) at 6 weeks · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 265 participantsModerate
Endovenous laser ablation vs conventional surgery
Disease‐specific QoL (AVVQ) at 1 year · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 99 participantsLow
Endovenous laser ablation vs conventional surgery
Complications at 6 weeks · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 265 participantsModerate
Ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy vs conventional surgery
Recanalisation or persistence of reflux at 6 weeks · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.34 [0.06, 2.1]1 study · 33 participantsLow
Ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy vs conventional surgery
Recurrence of reflux at 1 year · people requiring intervention for short saphenous vein varices
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.19 [0.29, 4.92]1 study · 31 participantsLow
Drug‐eluting balloon vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 12 months
Amputation · people with peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.56 [0.73, 3.33]9 studies · 1649 participantsHigh
Drug‐eluting balloon vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 12 months
Primary vessel patency · people with peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.92 [1.45, 2.56]3 studies · 882 participantsHigh
Drug‐eluting balloon vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 12 months
Target lesion revascularization · people with peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.4 [0.31, 0.51]11 studies · 1900 participantsLow
Drug‐eluting balloon vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 12 months
Binary restenosis · people with peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.38 [0.15, 0.98]4 studies · 1094 participantsModerate
Drug‐eluting balloon vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 12 months
Death · people with peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.09 [0.64, 1.85]9 studies · 1649 participantsHigh
Drug‐eluting balloon vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 12 months
Change in Rutherford category · people with peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 623 participantsModerate
Drug‐eluting balloon vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 12 months
Change in ankle‐brachial index · people with peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 656 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Incidence of recurrent VTE · patients with venous thromboembolism
Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.2 [0.11, 0.38]10 studies · 3536 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Incidence of major bleeding · patients with venous thromboembolism
Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
RR 3.44 [1.22, 9.74]6 studies · 1350 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Mortality · patients with venous thromboembolism
Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.35, 1.34]4 studies · 1049 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Days of catheter patency · Children with central venous catheter
Heparin‐bonded catheters for prolonging the patency of central venous catheters in children (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 200 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Catheter‐related thrombosis at any time during catheter stay · Children with central venous catheter
Heparin‐bonded catheters for prolonging the patency of central venous catheters in children (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.34 [0.01, 7.68]2 studies · 287 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Occlusion of catheter within one week of catheter insertion · Children with central venous catheter
Heparin‐bonded catheters for prolonging the patency of central venous catheters in children (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.06 [0, 1.07]1 study · 200 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Catheter‐related blood stream infection and CVC‐related colonization · Children with central venous catheter
Heparin‐bonded catheters for prolonging the patency of central venous catheters in children (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.06 [0.01, 0.41]1 study · 200 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Side effects: Thrombocytopenia after catheter insertion · Children with central venous catheter
Heparin‐bonded catheters for prolonging the patency of central venous catheters in children (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.73 [0.38, 1.39]2 studies · 287 participantsLow
Statin vs placebo
All cases of VTE · 17,802 patients with low to normal levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (< 130 mg/dL)
Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.57 [0.37, 0.86]1 study · 17802 participantsModerate
Statin vs placebo
Pulmonary embolism · 17,802 patients with low to normal levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (< 130 mg/dL)
Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 17802 participantsModerate
Statin vs placebo
Deep vein thrombosis · 17,802 patients with low to normal levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (< 130 mg/dL)
Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 17802 participantsModerate
Statin vs placebo
Any MI · 17,802 patients with low to normal levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (< 130 mg/dL)
Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.45 [0.3, 0.69]1 study · 17802 participantsModerate
Statin vs placebo
Any stroke · 17,802 patients with low to normal levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (< 130 mg/dL)
Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.51 [0.34, 0.78]1 study · 17802 participantsModerate
Statin vs placebo
Death · 17,802 patients with low to normal levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (< 130 mg/dL)
Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.8 [0.66, 0.96]1 study · 17802 participantsModerate
Statin vs placebo
Any serious adverse event · 17,802 patients with low to normal levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (< 130 mg/dL)
Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.07 [0.95, 1.2]1 study · 17802 participantsModerate
Knee length vs thigh length graduated compression stockings
Deep vein thrombosis (Fixed‐effect analysis) Venous duplex scan, contrast venography and fibrinogen uptake scan · patients with prevention of deep vein thrombosis1
Knee length versus thigh length graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in… (2012) · Cochrane
OR 1.55 [0.78, 3.07]3 studies · 496 participantsVery low
Knee length vs thigh length graduated compression stockings
Deep vein thrombosis (Random‐effects analysis) Venous duplex scan, contrast venography and fibrinogen uptake scan · patients with prevention of deep vein thrombosis1
Knee length versus thigh length graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in… (2012) · Cochrane
OR 1.32 [0.43, 4.06]3 studies · 496 participantsVery low
Knee length vs thigh length graduated compression stockings
Deep vein thrombosis (Risk Difference) Venous duplex scan, contrast venography and fibrinogen uptake scan · patients with prevention of deep vein thrombosis1
Knee length versus thigh length graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in… (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 496 participantsVery low