What do systematic reviews say?

Pulsed dye laser vs Nd:YAG laser

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Pulsed dye laser vs Nd:YAG laser

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Pulsed dye laser vs Nd:YAG laser

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 905 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 239 participants
  Very low

Intense pulsed light vs no treatment

Intense pulsed light may leads to higher participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment… compared with no treatment (low certainty).

• Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 9.67 [2.01, 46.43]
  1 study · 34 participants
  Low

Intense pulsed light vs no treatment

Intense pulsed light may leads to higher participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ axilla… compared with no treatment (low certainty).

• Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 21 [1.37, 322.28]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Low

Intense pulsed light vs no treatment

Intense pulsed light showed no clear difference in participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ groin… compared with no treatment (low certainty).

• Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 5 [0.31, 79.94]
  1 study · 8 participants
  Low

Intense pulsed light vs no treatment

Intense pulsed light showed no clear difference in participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐… compared with no treatment (low certainty).

• Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 3 [0.24, 37.67]
  1 study · 2 participants
  Low

Pulse cyclophosphamide vs continuous cyclophosphamide

Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in dialysis at end of study compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).

• Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.9 [0.92, 3.91]
  4 studies · 245 participants
  Low

Pulse cyclophosphamide vs continuous cyclophosphamide

Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in remission at 6 months compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).

• Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.03 [0.93, 1.13]
  2 studies · 176 participants
  Low

Pulse cyclophosphamide vs continuous cyclophosphamide

Pulse cyclophosphamide may leads to higher relapse at the end of compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).

• Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.79 [1.11, 2.87]
  4 studies · 235 participants
  Low

Pulse cyclophosphamide vs continuous cyclophosphamide

Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in adverse events ‐ treatment failure compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).

• Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.36 [0.115, 12.56]
  2 studies · 82 participants
  Low

Pulse cyclophosphamide vs continuous cyclophosphamide

Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in serious infections compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).

• Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.71 [0.38, 1.33]
  4 studies · 278 participants
  Low

Pulse cyclophosphamide vs continuous cyclophosphamide

Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in death at final compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).

• Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.77 [0.44, 1.32]
  4 studies · 278 participants
  Low

Pulse cyclophosphamide vs continuous cyclophosphamide

• Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 52 participants
  Low

Pulsed high‐intensity laser vs Placebo (sham) laser therapy

Pulsed high‐intensity laser showed no clear difference in change in burn‐related pruritus Itch Severity Scale (ISS) ( compared with placebo laser (moderate certainty).

• Interventions for postburn pruritus 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 49 participants
  Moderate

Pulsed high‐intensity laser vs Placebo (sham) laser therapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for postburn pruritus 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Pulsed high‐intensity laser vs Placebo (sham) laser therapy

Pulsed high‐intensity laser showed no clear difference in pain VAS ( compared with placebo laser (moderate certainty).

• Interventions for postburn pruritus 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 49 participants
  Moderate

Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound vs control

• Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 393 participants
  Very low