Cochrane · systematic review · CD010081

Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa

Ingram, JR, Woo, PN, Chua, SL, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

SkinAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
41
current version
GRADE rated
41
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 7 · 17.1%Low 11 · 26.8%Moderate 19 · 46.3%High 4 · 9.8%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Adalimumab weekly compared with placebo for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in DLQI score (imputation)
Adalimumab weekly vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Change in DLQI score (LOCF)
Adalimumab weekly vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Frequency of serious adverse effects
Adalimumab weekly vs placebo
RR 2 [0.38, 10.44]1 study · 102 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Frequency of treatment discontinuation
Adalimumab weekly vs placebo
RR 5 [0.25, 101.63]1 study · 102 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Proportion of participants with infectious adverse effects
Adalimumab weekly vs placebo
RR 0.94 [0.55, 1.62]1 study · 102 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Proportion with improvement in pain VAS
Adalimumab weekly vs placebo
RR 1.77 [1.02, 3.07]1 study · 96 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Change in modified Sartorius scale score (imputation)
Adalimumab weekly vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Adalimumab every other week compared with placebo for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in DLQI score (LOCF)
Adalimumab every other week vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 124 participantsHigh
Frequency of serious adverse effects
Adalimumab every other week vs placebo
RR 1.47 [0.26, 8.44]2 studies · 124 participantsHigh
Frequency of treatment discontinuation
Adalimumab every other week vs placebo
RR 4.91 [0.24, 99.74]2 studies · 124 participantsHigh
Proportion of participants with infectious adverse effects
Adalimumab every other week vs placebo
RR 1.6 [0.57, 4.53]2 studies · 124 participantsHigh
Change in Pain VAS
Adalimumab every other week vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 21 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Proportion with improvement in pain
Adalimumab every other week vs placebo
RR 1.34 [0.73, 2.43]1 study · 95 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Change in Sartorius scale score (LOCF)
Adalimumab every other week vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 124 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Infliximab compared with placebo for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
At least 50% decrease in HS Severity Index
Infliximab vs placebo
RR 4.8 [0.6, 38.48]1 study · 33 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Physician global assessment
Infliximab vs placebo
RR 4.8 [1.66, 13.9]1 study · 33 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Etanercept compared with placebo for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dermatology Life Quality Index
Etanercept vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Topical clindamycin compared with placebo for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse effects (non‐serious)
Topical clindamycin vs placebo
RR 0.72 [0.14, 3.64]1 study · 27 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Oral tetracycline compared with topical clindamycin for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Participant global assessment VAS Visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 to 100 mm)
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Pain VAS VAS (0 to 100 mm)
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Nodules score Nodule count
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Abscesses score Abscess count
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Physician global assessment VAS VAS (0 to 100 mm)
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Ethinyloestradiol and cyproterone acetate compared with ethinyloestradiol and norgestrel for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants reporting non‐serious adverse effects
Ethinyloestradiol and cyproterone acetate vs ethinyloestradiol and norgestrel
RR 0.53 [0.29, 0.98]1 study · 18 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Participant global assessment VAS Scale from: 0 to 100
Ethinyloestradiol and cyproterone acetate vs ethinyloestradiol and norgestrel
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Gentamicin sponge compared with primary closure alone for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse effects ‐ complication rate at 1 week after surgery
Gentamicin sponge vs primary closure alone
RR 0.78 [0.58, 1.05]1 study · 200 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse effects ‐ complication rate at 3 months after surgery
Gentamicin sponge vs primary closure alone
RR 0.9 [0.5, 1.62]1 study · 200 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Recurrence rate at 3 months after surgery
Gentamicin sponge vs primary closure alone
RR 0.96 [0.68, 1.34]1 study · 200 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Intense pulsed light compared with no treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment Questionnaire
Intense pulsed light vs no treatment
RR 9.67 [2.01, 46.43]1 study · 34 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ axilla Questionnaire
Intense pulsed light vs no treatment
RR 21 [1.37, 322.28]1 study · 24 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ groin Questionnaire
Intense pulsed light vs no treatment
RR 5 [0.31, 79.94]1 study · 8 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ inframammary Questionnaire
Intense pulsed light vs no treatment
RR 3 [0.24, 37.67]1 study · 2 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Nd:YAG laser compared with topical control for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Modified HS‐LASI score after 3 months
Nd:YAG laser vs topical control
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Modified HS‐LASI score after 3 months ‐ axilla
Nd:YAG laser vs topical control
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Modified HS‐LASI score after 3 months ‐ groin
Nd:YAG laser vs topical control
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Modified HS‐LASI score after 3 months ‐ inframammary
Nd:YAG laser vs topical control
no estimate extracted1 study · 8 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Percentage change in modified HS‐LASI score after 5 months compared with baseline
Nd:YAG laser vs topical control
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Percentage change in modified HS‐LASI score after 5 months compared with baseline ‐ axilla
Nd:YAG laser vs topical control
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Percentage change in modified HS‐LASI score after 5 months compared with baseline ‐ groin
Nd:YAG laser vs topical control
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Niosomal methylene blue gel PDT compared with free methylene blue gel PDT for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
HS‐LASI score
Niosomal methylene blue gel PDT vs free methylene blue gel PDT
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Staphage lysate compared with placebo broth for hidradenitis suppurativa

Population: participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Physician global assessment
Staphage lysate vs placebo broth
RR 6.25 [1.68, 23.27]1 study · 27 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision