Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

676 questions · 705 findings · 98 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 183 · 26%GRADE not reported 47 · 6.7%Very low 209 · 29.6%Low 153 · 21.7%Moderate 85 · 12.1%High 28 · 4%

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Visual acuity · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia
2 findings from 1 review

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Change in the interocular difference in contrast sensitivity Any validated test, from baseline to 16 (± 2) weeks · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Measurable change in stereopsis after 8 (± 2) weeks and 16 (± 2) weeks of intervention 'Real change' in stereopsis is defined as a change in stereoacuity of two or more octaves. · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effect of LF‐LAM vs no LF‐LAM on mortality and tuberculosis treatment initiation

Mortality at 8 weeks · adults living with HIV

Effect of LF‐LAM probably leads to lower mortality at 8 weeks compared with no LF‐LAM on mortality and tuberculosis treatment initiation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Effect of LF‐LAM vs no LF‐LAM on mortality and tuberculosis treatment initiation

People started on tuberculosis treatment · adults living with HIV

Effect of LF‐LAM showed no clear difference in people started on tuberculosis treatment compared with no LF‐LAM on mortality and tuberculosis treatment initiation (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review