Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,590 questions in 129 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

current versions
No studies 281 · 17.7%Ungraded 74 · 4.7%Very low 410 · 25.8%Low 420 · 26.4%Moderate 280 · 17.6%High 125 · 7.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Death from all causes · patients with early stage cervical cancer
Adjuvant platinum‐based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer (2016) · Cochrane
HR 0.56 [0.36, 0.87]2 studies · 297 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Disease progression · patients with early stage cervical cancer
Adjuvant platinum‐based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer (2016) · Cochrane
HR 0.47 [0.3, 0.74]2 studies · 297 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Grade 4 toxicity3 · patients with early stage cervical cancer
Adjuvant platinum‐based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer (2016) · Cochrane
RR 6.26 [2.5, 15.67]3 studies · 321 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Disease progression · patients with early stage cervical cancer
Adjuvant platinum‐based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer (2016) · Cochrane
HR 1.34 [0.24, 7.66]1 study · 71 participantsLow
Local anaesthetic infiltration (lignocaine 2%) vs saline injection
Pain scores during procedure (VAS: 0 to 100) · women undergoing outpatient colposcopy treatment
Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 130 participantsLow
Local anaesthetic plus vasoconstrictor vs no analgesia
Pain scores during procedure (VAS: 0 to 100) · women undergoing outpatient colposcopy treatment
Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 95 participantsLow
Oral analgesia vs placebo
Pain scores during procedure (VAS: 0 to 100) · women undergoing outpatient colposcopy treatment
Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 129 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Primary cure (remission) · women withe low‐risk GTN
First‐line chemotherapy in low‐risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.57, 0.75]6 studies · 577 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Failure of first‐line therapy · women withe low‐risk GTN
First‐line chemotherapy in low‐risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 3.55 [1.81, 6.95]6 studies · 577 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Severe adverse events (≥ grade 3) · women withe low‐risk GTN
First‐line chemotherapy in low‐risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.35 [0.08, 1.66]5 studies · 515 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Nausea · women withe low‐risk GTN
First‐line chemotherapy in low‐risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.29, 1.26]4 studies · 466 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Alopecia · women withe low‐risk GTN
First‐line chemotherapy in low‐risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRLow
Leuprorelin vs treosulfan
Progression‐free survival at 6 months№ of participants: 73(1 RCT) · Platinum‐resistant and refractory (relapsed) epithelial ovarian cancer
Luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for the treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.22, 1.68]NRVery low
Leuprorelin vs treosulfan
Progression‐free survival at 12 months№ of participants: 73(1 RCT) · Platinum‐resistant and refractory (relapsed) epithelial ovarian cancer
Luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for the treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.12, 3.66]NRVery low
Leuprorelin vs treosulfan
Overall survival · Platinum‐resistant and refractory (relapsed) epithelial ovarian cancer
Luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for the treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (2016) · Cochrane
HR 0.98 [0.58, 1.67]NRVery low
Leuprorelin vs treosulfan
Skin toxicity (alopecia)№ of participants: 73(1 RCT) · Platinum‐resistant and refractory (relapsed) epithelial ovarian cancer
Luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for the treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.32 [0.12, 0.91]NRVery low
Leuprorelin vs treosulfan
Gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea and vomiting)№ of participants: 73(1 RCT) · Platinum‐resistant and refractory (relapsed) epithelial ovarian cancer
Luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for the treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.12, 3.66]NRVery low
Leuprorelin vs treosulfan
Neurotoxicity№ of participants: 73(1 RCT) · Platinum‐resistant and refractory (relapsed) epithelial ovarian cancer
Luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for the treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.32 [0.01, 7.71]NRVery low
Leuprorelin vs treosulfan
Neutropenia grade 3/4№ of participants: 73(1 RCT) · Platinum‐resistant and refractory (relapsed) epithelial ovarian cancer
Luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for the treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Intervention NR
Physical well‐being SF‐36 Physical Component Summary Score 0 to 100, higher scores indicate higher levels of physical well‐being Immediately post‐intervention · Cancer patients with cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment
Non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 95 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Physical well‐being SF‐36 Physical Component Summary Score 0‐100, higher scores indicate higher levels of physical well‐being Two‐months post‐intervention · Cancer patients with cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment
Non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 95 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Psychological well‐being SF‐36 Mental Component Summary Score 0 to 100, higher scores indicate higher levels of physical well‐being Immediately post‐intervention · Cancer patients with cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment
Non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 95 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Psychological well‐being SF‐36 Mental Component Summary Score 0 to 100, higher scores indicate higher levels of physical well‐being Two‐months post‐intervention · Cancer patients with cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment
Non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 95 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Estimated total blood loss (mL) · adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of transfused units of red blood cell (RBC) · adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of transfused units of plasma · adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Rate of RBC transfusion (total number of participants who required at least one unit of red blood cell transfusion) Time: perioperative and postoperative periods · adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.4, 1.15]1 study · 100 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Rate of plasma transfusion (total number of participants who required at least one unit of plasma transfusion) Time: perioperative and postoperative periods · adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.44 [0.15, 1.35]1 study · 100 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Reoperation (Number of participants with at least one reoperation) Time: perioperative periods · adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.27, 2.55]1 study · 100 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Readmission (Number of participants with at least one readmission) Time: perioperative periods) · adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.75 [0.94, 8.06]1 study · 100 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Venous thromboembolic events (number of participants with at least one venous thromboembolic events) Time: 5‐week · adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.1, 2.61]1 study · 100 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Arterial thromboembolic events (number of participants with at least one venous thromboembolic events) Time: 5‐week · adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.99]1 study · 100 participantsVery low
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs placebo
Response to treatment at 5 to 6 months ‐ overall response · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 11.95 [3.21, 44.51]3 studies · 104 participantsHigh
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs cidofovir
Response to treatment at 6 months ‐ complete response · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.73, 1.37]1 study · 180 participantsModerate
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs cidofovir
Pain ‐ any grade · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.16 [0.92, 1.47]1 study · 168 participantsModerate
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs cidofovir
Fatigue ‐ any grade · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.25 [1.02, 1.55]1 study · 168 participantsModerate
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs cidofovir
Headache ‐ any grade · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.49 [1.12, 1.98]1 study · 168 participantsModerate
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs cidofovir
Total serious adverse events · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.26 [0.88, 1.81]1 study · 168 participantsModerate
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs cidofovir
Treatment discontinuation · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.33 [0.65, 2.74]1 study · 176 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Surgical excision versus laser vaporisationor other · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 73 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Laser vaporisation versus CUSA · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.53 [0.56, 4.15]1 study · 30 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Photodynamic therapy versus laser vaporisationand surgical excision · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
LEEP versus laser vaporisation and surgical excision · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs placebo
Response to treatment at 5 to 6 months ‐ complete response · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 14.4 [2.97, 69.8]3 studies · 104 participantsHigh
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs placebo
Response to treatment at 12 months ‐ overall response · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 9.1 [2.38, 34.77]1 study · 47 participantsModerate
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs placebo
Response to treatment at 12 months ‐ complete response · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 18.24 [1.12, 296.41]1 study · 47 participantsModerate
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs placebo
Progression to vulval cancer at 12 months · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.48 [0.05, 4.93]1 study · 47 participantsLow
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs placebo
HPV DNA persistence · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.43 [0.26, 0.72]1 study · 47 participantsHigh
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs placebo
Pain ‐ any grade · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 3.43 [1.8, 6.52]1 study · 52 participantsHigh
Summary of findings for imiquimod vs placebo
Dose reductions · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (2016) · Cochrane
RR 7.77 [1.61, 37.36]2 studies · 83 participantsHigh