Cochrane · systematic review · CD011732

Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

Kietpeerakool, C, Supoken, A, Laopaiboon, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
9
current version
GRADE rated
9
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 44.4%Low 5 · 55.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Comparison

Population: adult women with advanced EOC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (one randomised trial available)
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Estimated total blood loss (mL)
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Number of transfused units of red blood cell (RBC)
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Number of transfused units of plasma
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Rate of RBC transfusion (total number of participants who required at least one unit of red blood cell transfusion) Time: perioperative and postoperative periods
RR 0.68 [0.4, 1.15]1 study · 100 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Rate of plasma transfusion (total number of participants who required at least one unit of plasma transfusion) Time: perioperative and postoperative periods
RR 0.44 [0.15, 1.35]1 study · 100 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reoperation (Number of participants with at least one reoperation) Time: perioperative periods
RR 0.83 [0.27, 2.55]1 study · 100 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Readmission (Number of participants with at least one readmission) Time: perioperative periods)
RR 2.75 [0.94, 8.06]1 study · 100 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Venous thromboembolic events (number of participants with at least one venous thromboembolic events) Time: 5‐week
RR 0.5 [0.1, 2.61]1 study · 100 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Arterial thromboembolic events (number of participants with at least one venous thromboembolic events) Time: 5‐week
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.99]1 study · 100 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision