Cochrane · systematic review · CD006120

Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment

Gajjar, K, Martin-Hirsch, PPL, Bryant, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
3
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 2 · 66.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Local anaesthetic infiltration (lignocaine 2%) compared with saline injection for pain relief during outpatient colposcopy treatment

Population: women undergoing outpatient colposcopy treatment
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain scores during procedure (VAS: 0 to 100)
Local anaesthetic infiltration (lignocaine 2%) vs saline injection
no estimate extracted2 studies · 130 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Local anaesthetic plus vasoconstrictor compared with no analgesia for pain relief during outpatient colposcopy treatment

Population: women undergoing outpatient colposcopy treatment
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain scores during procedure (VAS: 0 to 100)
Local anaesthetic plus vasoconstrictor vs no analgesia
no estimate extracted2 studies · 95 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Oral analgesia compared with placebo for pain relief during outpatient colposcopy treatment

Population: women undergoing outpatient colposcopy treatment
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain scores during procedure (VAS: 0 to 100)
Oral analgesia vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 129 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias