Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,956 questions in 143 reviews · Musculoskeletal

current versions
No studies 555 · 28.4%Ungraded 107 · 5.5%Very low 255 · 13%Low 555 · 28.4%Moderate 357 · 18.3%High 127 · 6.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Chondroitin vs placebo
Number of serious adverse events · patients with osteoarthritis
Chondroitin for osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.4 [0.19, 0.82]6 studies · 954 participantsModerate
Chondroitin with or without glucosamine vs placebo/control
Pain (short‐ and long‐term) Scale from 0 to 100 mm (lower is better) · participants with osteoarthritis
Chondroitin for osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted17 studies · 2262 participantsLow
Chondroitin with or without glucosamine vs placebo/control
WOMAC MCII Pain subscale (reduction in knee pain by 20%) Long‐term studies (≥ 6 months) dose ≥ 800 mg/d · participants with osteoarthritis
Chondroitin for osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [1.01, 1.24]2 studies · 1253 participantsHigh
Rituximab (2 x 1000 mg) plus methotrexate vs methotrexate monotherapy
Clinical improvement American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria Analysis 1.2 · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 3.3 [2.3, 4.6]4 studies · 1165 participantsModerate
Rituximab (2 x 1000 mg) plus methotrexate vs methotrexate monotherapy
Clinical remission (Disease Activity Score‐28 joint count < 2.6) (Scale from 2 to 10) Analysis 1.7 · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 9.1 [0.76, 108.2]2 studies · 834 participantsModerate
Rituximab (2 x 1000 mg) plus methotrexate vs methotrexate monotherapy
Physical function (HAQ‐DI MCID = ‐0.22) Analysis 1.10 · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.6 [1.2, 2.1]4 studies · 1161 participantsHigh
Rituximab (2 x 1000 mg) plus methotrexate vs methotrexate monotherapy
No radiographic progression in total Genant‐modified Sharp score (range 0 to 290) Analysis 1.21 · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.2 [1, 1.4]1 study · 476 participantsModerate
Rituximab (2 x 1000 mg) plus methotrexate vs methotrexate monotherapy
Health‐related quality of life · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 2 [1.1, 3.4]4 studies · 1526 participantsHigh
Rituximab (2 x 1000 mg) plus methotrexate vs methotrexate monotherapy
Discontinuations due to adverse events Analysis 6.3 · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 2.1 [0.88, 4.9]5 studies · 1385 participantsModerate
Rituximab (2 x 1000 mg) plus methotrexate vs methotrexate monotherapy
Serious adverse events Analysis 11.2 · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.69, 1.5]4 studies · 1280 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table 1: comparison of operation types: early results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
Outcomesa · 125 hands in 121 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers for early outcomes (van Rijssen 2006)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table 2: comparison of operation types: late results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
Recurrence at 5 years Major outcome group 4 (recurrence) Defined as reoperation or progressive angular deformity of 20 degrees in a successfully treated joint · 93 participants (van Rijssen 2012a)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 93 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 2: comparison of operation types: late results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
Major outcome group 5 (adverse effects)d · 93 participants (van Rijssen 2012a)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table 3: comparison of operation types: firebreak skin grafting vs z‐plasty closure of fasciectomy
PEM hand function score at 3 years Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 77, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 77 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 79 participants (Ullah 2009)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 79 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 3: comparison of operation types: firebreak skin grafting vs z‐plasty closure of fasciectomy
Major outcome group 2 (patient satisfaction and other PROM) · 79 participants (Ullah 2009)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table 3: comparison of operation types: firebreak skin grafting vs z‐plasty closure of fasciectomy
Correction of MCPJ and PIPJ deformities at 2 weeks Major outcome group 3 (early angular outcomes) · 79 participants (Ullah 2009)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 79 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 3: comparison of operation types: firebreak skin grafting vs z‐plasty closure of fasciectomy
Progressive contracture by 3 years Major outcome group 4 (recurrence) · 79 participants (Ullah 2009)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 79 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 3: comparison of operation types: firebreak skin grafting vs z‐plasty closure of fasciectomy
Hypoaesthesia Major outcome group 5 (adverse effects) · 79 participants (Ullah 2009)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 79 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone
DASH hand function score at 3 months Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 100 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis…
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 205 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone
Major outcome group 2 (patient satisfaction) · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis…
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone
Total active extension at 3 months Major outcome group 3 (early objective measurement) Total active extension (TAE) of MCPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ; higher value indicates loss of extension and a worse outcome · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis…
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 225 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 1: comparison of operation types: early results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
DASH hand function score at 5 weeks Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 100 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 125 hands in 121 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers for early outcomes (van Rijssen 2006)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 97 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone
Major outcome group 4 (recurrence) · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis…
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone
Total active flexion at three months Major outcome group 5 (adverse effects) Total active flexion (TAF) of MCPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ; lower value indicates loss of flexion and a worse outcome · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis…
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 225 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 1: comparison of operation types: early results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
Patient satisfaction at 6 weeks Major outcome group 2 (other PROM) (scores from "0 (no/very negative) to 10 (yes/very positive)") · 125 hands in 121 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers for early outcomes (van Rijssen 2006)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 121 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 1: comparison of operation types: early results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
Early angular outcome at 6 weeks for Tubiana grade I disease (total passive extension deficit (TPED) of the MCPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ for preoperative contractures with a TPED of 0 to 45 degrees) Early angular outcome at 6 weeks for Tubiana grade II dis... · 125 hands in 121 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers for early outcomes (van Rijssen 2006)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 1: comparison of operation types: early results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
Major outcome group 4 (recurrence) · 125 hands in 121 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers for early outcomes (van Rijssen 2006)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table 1: comparison of operation types: early results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
Paraesthesia at 1 week Major outcome group 5 (adverse effects) Defined as "tingling sensations at any part of the treated digit without objective disturbance of sensation at the tip of the digit" per hand · 125 hands in 121 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers for early outcomes (van Rijssen 2006)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 117 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 2: comparison of operation types: late results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
DASH hand function score at 5 years Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 100 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 93 participants (van Rijssen 2012a)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table 2: comparison of operation types: late results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
Patient satisfaction at 5 years Major outcome group 2 (other PROM) (scores between "1 (not at all), 10 (excellent)") · 93 participants (van Rijssen 2012a)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 93 participantsLow
Summary of findings table 2: comparison of operation types: late results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy
Major outcome group 3 (early angular outcome)b · 93 participants (van Rijssen 2012a)
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pain (at study completion) WOMAC (VAS or NRS) from 0 to 20; lower scores mean reduced pain · People with hip or knee osteoarthritis
High‐intensity versus low‐intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 313 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Physical function (at study completion) WOMAC (self administered health status measure) from 0 to 68; lower scores mean better function · People with hip or knee osteoarthritis
High‐intensity versus low‐intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 310 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Quality of life (at study completion) EuroQol (VAS) from 0 to 200 mm; higher score means better function · People with hip or knee osteoarthritis
High‐intensity versus low‐intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 214 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Adverse effects (related to the exercise programs) · People with hip or knee osteoarthritis
High‐intensity versus low‐intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
Peto OR 1.72 [0.51, 5.81]4 studies · 364 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Severe adverse events or withdrawals (due to adverse events) ‐ not reported · People with hip or knee osteoarthritis
High‐intensity versus low‐intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Subgroup analysis: Exercise duration vs resistance
Pain ‐ duration exercise WOMAC (VAS or Likert) from 0 to 20 · People with knee or hip osteoarthritis
High‐intensity versus low‐intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 200 participantsVery low
Subgroup analysis: Exercise duration vs resistance
Pain ‐ resistance exercise WOMAC (VAS or Likert) from 0 to 20 · People with knee or hip osteoarthritis
High‐intensity versus low‐intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 113 participantsVery low
Subgroup analysis: Exercise duration vs resistance
Function ‐ duration exercise WOMAC from 0 to 68 · People with knee or hip osteoarthritis
High‐intensity versus low‐intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 200 participantsVery low
Subgroup analysis: Exercise duration vs resistance
Function ‐ resistance exercise WOMAC from 0 to 68 · People with knee or hip osteoarthritis
High‐intensity versus low‐intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 113 participantsLow
Intervention NR
AOS total (Pain & Physical function) AOS total score. Scale from: 0 to 100 (0 = being no pain/disability, 100 = worst imaginable pain/disability). · patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle
Hyaluronic acid and other conservative treatment options for osteoarthritis of the ankle (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 45 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Radiographic Joint Structure Changes · patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle
Hyaluronic acid and other conservative treatment options for osteoarthritis of the ankle (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Quality of Life SF12. Scale from: 0 to 100. · patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle
Hyaluronic acid and other conservative treatment options for osteoarthritis of the ankle (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 45 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle
Hyaluronic acid and other conservative treatment options for osteoarthritis of the ankle (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 109 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Number of participants experiencing any adverse event · patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle
Hyaluronic acid and other conservative treatment options for osteoarthritis of the ankle (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.66 [0.47, 5.88]3 studies · 109 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Participants who withdraw because of an adverse event or any other reason · patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle
Hyaluronic acid and other conservative treatment options for osteoarthritis of the ankle (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 109 participantsUngraded
Traditional NSAIDs vs placebo
Pain on VAS Scale from 0 to 100 mm (higher is worse) · patients with axSpA (AS and nr‐axSpA)
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for axial spondyloarthritis (ankylosing spondylitis and… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted850 participantsHigh
COX‐2 NSAIDs vs placebo
BASDAI Scale from 0 to 100 (higher is worse) · patients with axSpA (AS and nr‐axSpA)
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for axial spondyloarthritis (ankylosing spondylitis and… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted193 participantsModerate
COX‐2 NSAIDs vs placebo
BASFI Scale from 0 to 100 (higher is worse) · patients with axSpA (AS and nr‐axSpA)
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for axial spondyloarthritis (ankylosing spondylitis and… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted349 participantsHigh
COX‐2 NSAIDs vs placebo
BASMI Scale from 0 to 10 (higher is worse) · patients with axSpA (AS and nr‐axSpA)
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for axial spondyloarthritis (ankylosing spondylitis and… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies