Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,361 questions in 120 reviews · Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems

current versions
No studies 286 · 21%Ungraded 61 · 4.5%Very low 381 · 28%Low 381 · 28%Moderate 228 · 16.8%High 24 · 1.8%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Tremor 8 weeks of treatment · children/youth with ASD
Aripiprazole for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 313 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Relapse rate 16 weeks of treatment · children/youth with ASD
Aripiprazole for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 85 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Standardised tests of reading, writing, spelling or mathematics skills (overall) · children with specific learning disorders
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) for children with specific learning disorders (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Adverse effect (gastrointestinal disturbance) · children with specific learning disorders
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) for children with specific learning disorders (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.43 [0.25, 8.15]2 studies · 116 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Anaemia at end of therapy (total), as defined by trial authors · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.39 [0.25, 0.6]10 studies · 3273 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Abdominal pain (total), events during study, as defined and reported by trial authors · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.55 [0.99, 2.41]7 studies · 1190 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Cognitive function, as measured by trial authors · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Haemoglobin at end of therapy (total), g/L · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
MD 5.3 [4.14, 6.45]51 studies · 6861 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Iron deficiency at end of therapy (total), as defined by trial authors · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.62 [0.5, 0.76]7 studies · 1088 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Iron‐deficiency anaemia at end of therapy, as defined by trial authors · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 55 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
All‐cause mortality, over the course of the study · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Any adverse side effects (total), as defined and reported by trial authors · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.14 [0.94, 4.86]7 studies · 901 participantsLow
Intervention NR
GI side effects (total), events during study, as defined and reported by trial authors · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.99 [1.26, 3.12]5 studies · 521 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Loose stools/diarrhoea (total), events during study, as defined and reported by trial authors · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.13 [1.1, 4.11]6 studies · 604 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Hard stools/constipation (total), events during study, as defined and reported by trial authors · menstruating women (non‐pregnant women of reproductive age)
Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.07 [1.35, 3.17]8 studies · 1036 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Total ADHD symptom score ‐ parent ratings (ADHD Rating Scale, Fourth Version; Conners' Rating Scale; Conners' Global Index; Conners' Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire) · children or adolescents with ADHD
Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 1247 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Total ADHD symptom score ‐ teacher ratings (ADHD Rating Scale, Fourth Version; Conners' Rating Scale; Conners' Global Index; Conners' Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire) · children or adolescents with ADHD
Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 745 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Total ADHD symptom score ‐ clinician ratings (ADHD Rating Scale, Fourth Version) · children or adolescents with ADHD
Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 813 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Proportion of responders (Clinical Global Impressions ‐ Improvement (CGI‐I) scale) · children or adolescents with ADHD
Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 3.36 [2.48, 4.55]9 studies · 2207 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Academic performance (Permanent Product Measure of Performance; Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children ‐ Revised; Barnell Lot, Ltd Math Test; Wide Range Achievement Test) · children or adolescents with ADHD
Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
SMD 0.56 [0.39, 0.73]8 studies · 826 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Retention: proportion of participants who completed the trial · children or adolescents with ADHD
Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.97, 1.1]11 studies · 2381 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Proportion of participants who experienced at least 1 adverse event · children or adolescents with ADHD
Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.3 [1.18, 1.44]6 studies · 1742 participantsLow
Simethicone vs placebo
Reduction in crying duration Difference between final values (hours per day of crying) · infants with infantile colic
Pain‐relieving agents for infantile colic (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 27 participantsVery low
Simethicone vs placebo
Responders Number of infants who improved after treatment · infants with infantile colic
Pain‐relieving agents for infantile colic (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.73, 1.23]2 studies · 110 participantsLow
Herbal agents vs placebo
Reduction in crying duration Difference before and after treatment (hours per day of crying) · patients with infantile colic
Pain‐relieving agents for infantile colic (2016) · Cochrane
MD 1.33 [0.71, 1.96]3 studies · 279 participantsLow
Herbal agents vs placebo
Responders Number of infants who improved after treatment · patients with infantile colic
Pain‐relieving agents for infantile colic (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.05 [1.56, 2.7]3 studies · 277 participantsModerate
Sugar vs placebo
Reduction in crying duration Difference before and after treatment (hours per day of crying) · infants with infantile colic
Pain‐relieving agents for infantile colic (2016) · Cochrane
MD 1.72 [1.38, 2.06]1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Cimetropium bromide vs placebo
Reduction in crying duration Difference between final values (minutes per crisis of crying) · infants with infantile colic
Pain‐relieving agents for infantile colic (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 86 participantsVery low
Cimetropium bromide vs placebo
Responders Number of infants who improved after treatment · infants with infantile colic
Pain‐relieving agents for infantile colic (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.29 [1.44, 3.64]1 study · 86 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Social interaction and communication ‐ Parental ATEC score (scale from 0 to 40) · children with ASD
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Social interaction and communication ‐ Clinician ATEC score (scale from 0 to 40) · children with ASD
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Behavioral problems ‐ Parental ATEC score · children with ASD
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Behavioral problems ‐ Clinician ATEC score (scale from 0 to 40) · children with ASD
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Protective behaviours (self protective events measured using a stranger simulation test immediately post intervention) · children (aged 5 to 12) and adolescents (aged 13 to 18)
School‐based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse (2015) · Cochrane
OR 5.71 [1.98, 16.51]2 studies · 102 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Questionnaire‐based knowledge (factual knowledge measured by assessing responses to items on a questionnaire or multi‐choice test, immediately post intervention) (higher score = higher knowledge) · children (aged 5 to 12) and adolescents (aged 13 to 18)
School‐based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted18 studies · 4657 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Vignette‐based knowledge (applied knowledge measured by assessing responses to hypothetical scenarios, immediately post intervention) (higher score = higher knowledge) · children (aged 5 to 12) and adolescents (aged 13 to 18)
School‐based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 1688 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Harm (measured using anxiety or fear questionnaires) · children (aged 5 to 12) and adolescents (aged 13 to 18)
School‐based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 795 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Disclosures (of past or current child sexual abuse made during or after programme completion) · children (aged 5 to 12) and adolescents (aged 13 to 18)
School‐based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse (2015) · Cochrane
OR 3.56 [1.13, 11.24]3 studies · 1788 participantsModerate
Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Physical abuse Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS; 80 items rated on a 7‐point scale) · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 265 participantsLow
Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Sexual abuse CTS sexual abuse single‐item mean change from baseline · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 110 participantsModerate
Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Emotional abuse Outcome was measured on different scales in different studiesj · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 558 participantsLow
Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Emotional abuse CTS mean change from baseline · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 110 participantsModerate
Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Overall abuse Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA) score. Scale from 0 to 30 · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsLow
Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Physical abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.61 [0.33, 1.14]2 studies · 182 participantsVery low
Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Emotional abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.58 [0.3, 1.13]1 study · 141 participantsModerate
Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Emotional abuse Index of Psychological Abuse (IPA; 33 items rated on a 4‐point scale) · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 265 participantsVery low
Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Overall abuse One study used a composite of two scales (12 items. Scale from 0 to 36) Other study used Composite Abuse Scale (CAS)i (30 items presented in a 6‐point format requiring respondents to answer 'never', 'only once', 'several times', 'mon... · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 181 participantsVery low
Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Overall abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.72 [0.29, 1.79]1 study · 103 participantsVery low
Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Physical abuse Outcome was measured on different scales in different studiesa · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 558 participantsModerate
Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Physical abuse by severity ‐ severe Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) mean change from baseline · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 110 participantsModerate